ARTICLE 1
PREAMBLE
Section 1. Date of Agreement.
This Agreement made, entered into, and first effective
this 11th day of March, 2004, (unless specific provisions
or Exhibit terms set forth a later effective date) by and between
the CITY of Austin, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the “CITY,”
and the Austin Police ASSOCIATION, hereinafter referred to as the
“ASSOCIATION,” and its terms shall be effective only until the expiration
date of the Agreement, or as stipulated in this Agreement.
Section 2. Purpose of Agreement
WHEREAS, the CITY has voluntarily endorsed the practices
and procedures of the statutory meet and confer process as an orderly
way of conducting its relations with its police officers, insofar
as such practices and procedures are appropriate to the functions
and obligations of the CITY to retain the rights to operate the CITY
government effectively in a responsible and efficient manner; and
WHEREAS, the ASSOCIATION has pledged to support the
service and mission of the Austin Police Department and to abide by
the statutorily imposed no strike or work slow down obligations placed
upon it; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent and purpose of the parties
to set forth herein their entire Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE mutual covenants
and agreements herein contained, the parties mutually agree as follows:
back to top
ARTICLE 2
DEFINITIONS
The following definitions apply to terms used in this
Agreement, unless a different definition is required by the context
in which the term is used.
1. “ASSOCIATION”
means the Austin Police Association, and its officers and agents authorized
to act on its behalf.
2. “Chief”
means the Chief of Police of the Austin Police Department or his designee.
3. “Employer”
or “CITY” means the City of Austin, Texas, the Austin Police Department
and its officers, agents, managers, and others authorized to act on
the CITY's behalf.
4.
“HRD” means
the City of Austin's Human Resources Department.
5.
“Officer” means,
all police officers, as the term is currently defined in Texas Local Government Code, Section 143.003 (5), and those hired under the provisions of this Agreement
in the Austin Police Department, except the Head of the Department
and, unless otherwise specified, Assistant Department Heads in the
rank or classification immediately below that of the Department Head. The term also excludes cadets, civilian employees,
retirees, and any other employees specifically exempted by the terms
of this Agreement. Probationary officers are excluded from the coverage
of Article 18 and cannot file grievances pursuant to Article 20 regarding
disciplinary actions.
6. “Meet and
Confer Statute” means Subchapter I of Chapter 143 of the Texas Local Government
Code, Sections 143.301‑143.313.
7. "Chapter
143" means Chapter 143 of the Texas Local Government Code.
8. “Authorized
ASSOCIATION Representative” means a representative of the ASSOCIATION
authorized by the ASSOCIATION's executive board to conduct business
on behalf of the ASSOCIATION.
9. “Police
Civil Service Commission” means the three (3) member Civil Service
Commission appointed by the City Manager, pursuant to Section 143.006
of the Texas Local Government Code.
10. “Preemption.” To the extent that any provision of this article
conflicts with or changes Chapter 143 or any other statute, executive
order, local ordinance, or rule, this Agreement shall supersede such
provision, as authorized by Section 143.307 of the Texas Local Government
Code. back to top
ARTICLE 3
RECOGNITION
The CITY recognizes the ASSOCIATION as the sole and
exclusive bargaining agent for all covered police officers, pursuant
to Section 143.301 et seq. of Chapter 143, excluding the Police Chief,
the Assistant Police Chiefs, and all civilian employees of the Police
Department. back to top
ARTICLE 4
MANAGEMENT RIGHTS
Section
1. Retained Rights – General
The CITY retains all inherent rights to manage the Police
Department and its work force which it presently enjoys, subject to
applicable federal and state statutes and local ordinances, resolutions,
and rules, except as specifically provided in this Agreement. These rights include, but are not limited to:
direction of the work force, including but not limited to, the right
to hire; the right to discipline or discharge; the right to decide
job qualifications for hiring; the right to lay‑off or abolish
positions; the right to make rules and regulations governing conduct
and safety; the right to determine schedules of work together with
the right to determine the methods, processes and manner of performing
work; the determination of the size of the work force, and the assignment
of work to officers within
the department, including the right to transfer officers; the determination of policy affecting the selection
of new officers; the right to establish the services and programs
provided by the department, including the nature and level of such
services and programs, as well as the type and quantity of resources
allocated; the right to establish work performance measurement and
standards; and the right to implement programs to increase
the cost effectiveness of departmental operations.
Section 2.
Retained Right of Independent Investigation.
The
Chief of Police and the City Manager fully retain their rights to
independently investigate police conduct.
Section 3.
Public Report by Volunteer Citizen Panel or Independent Investigator
a)
The provisions of Section 143.089(g) of the Texas Local
Government Code are expressly modified to the extent necessary to
permit public release of a final report prepared by an investigator
who conducts an Independent Investigation authorized by the Chief
of Police or City Manager concerning police conduct. An “Independent
Investigation” does not include attorney-client work product or privileged
material related to the defense of claims or suits against the City
of Austin. The release
of a Volunteer Citizen Panel (hereinafter “Panel”) report is also
authorized, subject to the limitations in this agreement.
b)
The public release of information authorized by this
Section shall not contain or reveal evidentiary facts, or other substantive
investigative information from the file, except to the extent that
such information is at the time of such release no longer protected
from public disclosure by law, or is already public as a matter of
fact by lawful or authorized means or by the officer’s own release. For example, the names of officers in an investigation
may not be released; but could be released if those officers have
elected to enter the public debate and discuss their involvement,
or if the public has been informed of identities by lawful or authorized
means in the course of grand jury or other legal proceedings. Likewise,
the name, identifying characteristics, or contact information for
any involved party or complainant shall not be released, except to
the extent that such information is at the time of such release no
longer protected from public disclosure by law, or is already public
as a matter of fact by lawful or authorized means or by the officer’s
own release. The public statements
authorized in this agreement are subject to review by the City of
Austin Department of Law to insure compliance with this agreement
and to determine whether the release of such information may be prohibited
by any other law.
c)
This Section
shall apply to any Independent Investigation or citizen panel report
whether completed prior to or after the effective date of this Agreement, and applies to every position and rank within the Austin
Police Department. back to top
ARTICLE 5
NON‑DISCRIMINATION
Section 1. Discrimination Prohibited.
Neither the CITY nor the ASSOCIATION shall discriminate
with regard to the implementation of any term or condition of this
contract, against any officer covered by this Agreement in a manner
which discrimination would violate any applicable federal or state
law or any CITY ordinances on the basis of race, creed, color, national
origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, or disability.
Section 2. Association Membership or Activity.
Neither the CITY nor the ASSOCIATION shall interfere
with the right of officers covered by this Agreement to become or
not become members of the ASSOCIATION, and there shall be no discrimination
against such officers because of lawful ASSOCIATION membership or
non‑membership activity or status.
Section 3. Association Fair Representation.
The ASSOCIATION recognizes its responsibility as the
exclusive representative under the meet and confer statute and agrees
to fairly represent all officers in the Department covered by this
Agreement. back to top
ARTICLE 6
UNION DUES,
CHECK OFF AND INDEMNIFICATION
Section 1. Dues Check Off.
Upon receipt of a signed authorization from an officer
on a form supplied by the CITY, the dues and assessments that existed
on the date of this Agreement, including but not necessarily limited
to: APA dues, pagers, telephones, PAC, dues for Amigos en Azul and
Texas Peace Officers Association, shall be deducted from such officer's
pay. Officers who are already having dues deducted as of the execution
date of this Agreement are not required to submit a new dues deduction
form. The dues deductions shall be remitted promptly to the treasurer
of the ASSOCIATION. The ASSOCIATION agrees to defray the actual cost
of making such deductions, not to exceed the per deduction amount
paid by other employee associations. The City agrees to provide a
list of those members for whom deductions are made each month. The
ASSOCIATION may change the amount of the deduction for those employees
who have authorized payroll deductions by providing the City with
a letter, at least thirty (30) days in advance of the change, from
the ASSOCIATION President advising the City that the amount has changed
pursuant to the requirements of the ASSOCIATION's Constitution and
Bylaws. The ASSOCIATION will
promptly refund to the CITY any amount paid to the ASSOCIATION in
error on account of this dues deduction provision. Additional assessments may be deducted by mutual
agreement of the parties.
Section 2. Indemnification.
The ASSOCIATION shall jointly defend the provisions
of this article on behalf of both parties, and shall indemnify the
CITY and any departments of the CITY and hold it harmless against
any and all claims, demands, suits or other forms of liability that
may arise out of, or by reason of, any actions taken by the CITY or
any department of the CITY for any purpose of complying with provisions
of this article. The Association
shall be entitled to select and direct counsel for such defense, but
shall reasonably cooperate with counsel designated by the City Attorney
to participate.
The CITY agrees that it will not authorize payroll deduction
of dues or fees for any organization that purports to represent Austin police officers in employment matters, that is not
currently authorized to have payroll deduction of dues. This requirement shall not apply to organizations
that enjoyed dues check off as of the date the Austin City Council
recognized the APA as the sole and exclusive bargaining representative
of officers in the Department, including the Austin Police Association
and the Combined Law Enforcement Association of Texas back
to top
ARTICLE 7
WAGES AND BENEFITS
Section 1.
Wage and Benefit Changes.
Beginning on the effective date of this agreement, the
Base Salary Schedule contained in Appendix A shall apply. Future wage increases shall occur in accordance
with the public safety premium provisions in Article 21.
Section 2. Longevity Pay.
Longevity pay shall continue to be paid in a lump sum
in the first regularly scheduled pay period after the officer's anniversary
date, which is the annual anniversary of the officer's most recent
commission date. This change
in payment of longevity does not affect the treatment of longevity
for retirement and overtime purposes, and the CITY and the officers
shall continue making retirement contributions for longevity payments.
Effective October 1, 2005, longevity pay shall increase to seventy dollars ($70.00)
per year of service, up to a maximum of 25 years.
Effective October 1, 2007, longevity pay shall increase to ninety six dollars
($96.00) per year of service, up to a maximum of 25 years.
It is expressly understood and agreed that this section
shall be entitled to preemption including but not limited to the provision
of §141.032 of the Texas Local Government Code.
Section 3. Retirement Contributions for Cadets.
The CITY agrees to continue contributions for cadets
to the Police Retirement System.
Section 4. Field Training Officer Pay.
Field training officer (FTO) pay shall be paid at the
effective rate of one hundred and seventy five ($175.00) per month
to each officer assigned in the FTO program, as selected according
to criteria established by the Chief.
This payment shall not be made to officers assigned to the
Training Division, to the FTO Program Coordinator.
Officers authorized to train probationary patrol officers during
their probationary period, and not a part of the FTO program, will
be compensated for the actual hours spent training.
It is expressly understood and agreed that this section
shall be entitled to preemption including but not limited to the provision
of §143.043 of the Texas Local Government Code.
Section 5. Mental Health Certification Pay.
Effective October 1, 2004 Mental Health Certification Pay shall be paid at the
effective rate of one hundred and seventy five dollars ($175.00) per
month to each officer assigned to a Patrol Shift, and serving as a
Mental Health Officer as selected and approved according to criteria
established by the Chief. This payment shall not be made to the officers
assigned to the Crisis Intervention Team.
It is
expressly understood and agreed that this section shall be entitled
to preemption including but not limited to the provision of §143.042
of the Texas Local Government Code.
Section 6. Bilingual Pay.
Bilingual pay will be paid at the rate of one hundred
and seventy five ($175.00) per month for officers certified under
standards established by the Chief and assigned to the bilingual program.
Effective October 1, 2004, it is further agreed that the current bilingual program
shall be expanded the German language in addition to the previously
approved French/Haitian, Asian (Vietnamese, Cantonese, Thai, Korean,
Japanese, and Malaysian), and sign language for the deaf.
The parties have agreed to include this language solely based
on the level of continuing need in the field for interpretation during
police calls and contacts. Officers
will not be paid cumulatively if they are certified in more than one
language.
It is expressly understood and agreed that this section
shall be entitled to preemption including but not limited to the provision
of §143.042 of the Texas Local Government Code.
Section 7.
Compensation for Lieutenants and Commanders.
Lieutenants and Commanders shall be compensated on a
salary basis and are exempt employees for purposes of overtime compensation
under applicable federal law. The
parties further agree that the Lieutenants and Commanders accept their
salaries as inclusive of any and all overtime compensation. Lieutenants
permanently assigned to an evening or night shift in Patrol shall
be paid an additional stipend of one hundred and twenty five ($125.00)
per month upon this contract agreement; effective October 1, 2004 the stipend shall be two hundred and seventy five ($275.00)
per month; effective October 1, 2005 the stipend shall be three hundred ($300.00) per month.
Lieutenants assigned to a Patrol Area Command who are assigned to
an evening or night shift for a twenty eight (28) day cycle, when
the shift begins at or after 2:00 p.m., shall be entitled to one hundred
and twenty five dollars ($125.00) monthly stipend for each twenty
eight (28) day cycle upon this contract agreement; effective October
1, 2004 the stipend shall be two hundred and seventy five dollars
($275.00) per month; effective October 1, 2005, the stipend shall
be three hundred dollars $300.00) per month.
It is expressly understood and agreed that this section
shall be entitled to preemption including but not limited to the provision
of §143.047 and §142.015 of the Texas Local Government Code.
Section 8. Assistant
Chiefs.
The Chief of Police has the right to
set wages and benefits for the Assistant Chiefs, subject to the approval
of the City Council as a part of the budget.
The Chief may designate one Assistant Chief as the Executive
Assistant or Chief of Staff, whose pay and benefits may be different
than the other Assistant Chiefs. Bonuses
for performance may be made in the Chief's discretion.
It is expressly understood and agreed that this section
shall be entitled to preemption including but not limited to the provision
of §142.015 and §143.041 of the Texas Local Government Code.
Section 9. Clothing Allowance.
During the term of this contract, the clothing allowance
shall be five hundred dollars ($500.00) per year for all officers
deemed eligible by the Chief, with a payment schedule to be determined
by the Chief.
Section 10. Education and Certificate
Pay.
An officer shall be entitled to either
Certificate pay or Education pay, at the highest qualifying rate,
but shall not be entitled to both.
Education pay shall only be payable for degrees or college
credit from an accredited college or university.
An accredited college or university is an institution of higher
education that is accredited or authorized by the Southern Association
of Colleges and Schools, the Middle States Association of Colleges
and Schools, the New England Association of Schools and Colleges,
the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools, the Northwest
Association of Schools and Colleges, or the Western Association of
Schools and Colleges (Reference: TCLEOSE Rule 211.1(a)(2), as modified
by the Commission from time to time).
Each officer holding an Intermediate TCLEOSE Certificate
shall be paid fifty dollars ($50.00) per month. Each officer holding an Advanced TCLEOSE Certificate
shall be paid one hundred dollars ($100) per month. Each officer holding a Master TCLEOSE Certificate
shall be paid one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00) per month.
Education Incentive Pay:
Effective
October
1, 2004, Education
Incentive Pay shall be paid as follows:
a)
Each officer
holding an Associate’s degree or 60 hours of college credit shall
be paid one hundred dollars ($100.00) per month.
b)
Each officer
holding a Bachelor's degree shall be paid two hundred and twenty dollars
($220.00) per month.
c)
Each officer
holding a Master’s degree shall be paid three hundred dollars ($300.00)
per month.
d)
No officer hired
after March 25, 2001, will
be eligible for Intermediate or Advanced Certificate pay. Education pay incentive amounts at or above
those set forth in this agreement remain in effect, and this agreement
continues the right of all officers to qualify for or achieve Master
Certification pay.
It is expressly understood and agreed that this section
shall be entitled to preemption including but not limited to the provision
of §143.044 of the Texas Local Government Code.
Section 11. Shift Differential.
The CITY shall pay an additional two
hundred dollars ($200.00) effective upon this contract agreement;
effective October 1, 2004 two hundred and seventy five ($275.00) per
month; effective October 1, 2005 three hundred ($300.00) per month
to an officer normally assigned to an evening or night shift for a
twenty eight (28) day cycle, when the shift begins at or after 2:00
p.m. Only officers working 50% or more of their shifts beginning after
2:00 p.m., in a 28 day cycle, shall be eligible.
Shift differential pay shall apply to all ranks up to and including
Sergeant. This provision shall
apply in lieu of the City policy applicable to shift differential
for any other employees
It is expressly understood and agreed that this section
shall be entitled to preemption including but not limited to the provision
of §143.047 of the Texas Local Government Code.
Section 12.
Monthly Paid Compensation.
It is expressly understood and agreed that the CITY
reserves the right to pro‑rate and pay all monthly payments
in bi‑weekly equivalents. back to top
ARTICLE 8
OVERTIME, CALL BACK, COURT TIME, AND ON-CALL
Section 1. Overtime.
Beginning October 1, 2001, for purposes of computing overtime, all approved paid
leave time, other than sick leave, shall be calculated as hours worked.
Section 2. On-call status.
The City will allow eight (8) hours of comp time per
week for any non-exempt officer on call, as defined by Department
policy implemented by the Chief. Officers
placed on “court call” while under subpoena to court for two or more
consecutive days, shall not be eligible under the prior sentence,
but shall receive one (1) hour of additional comp time per day for
each regularly scheduled day off or pre-approved leave day.
Section 3. Call back and Court time.
a)
Effective with
this contract an officer who attends court more than one hour before
the start of his/her regularly scheduled shift shall receive a minimum
of three (3) hours compensation at time and one half. (e.g. If the
officer is assigned to work from 9:00
a.m. till 7:00 p.m., and he/she must attend municipal court at 7:00 a.m. the same day, the officer is entitled to three (3)
hours of overtime.)
b) Effective
October 1, 2005, an officer who attends court more than one hour before
the start of his/her regularly scheduled shift shall receive a minimum
of four (4) hours compensation at time and one half. (e.g. If the
officer is assigned to work from 9:00
a.m. till 7:00 p.m., and he/she must attend municipal court at 7:00 a.m. the same day, the officer is entitled to four (4) hours
of overtime).
c) If the
officer attends court one hour or less before the start of his/her
regularly scheduled shift, the officer shall receive one (1) full hour of compensation at time and one half.
(e.g. if the officer’s shift starts at 9:00 a.m., but he/she
must attend municipal court at 8:00 a.m. or later, the officer shall
receive one full hour of overtime).
d) Effective
with this contract an officer who attends court after his/her regularly
scheduled shift has ended shall receive a minimum of three (3) hours
compensation at time and one half (e.g. If the officer is assigned
to work from 10:00 p.m. till 8:00 a.m., and he/she must attend municipal
court at 8:00 a.m. the same date, the officer is entitled to three
(3) hours of overtime).
e) Effective
October 1, 2005, an officer who attends court after his/her regularly
scheduled shift has ended shall receive a minimum of four (4) hours
compensation at time and one half (e.g. If the officer is assigned
to work from 10:00 p.m. till 8:00 a.m., and he/she must attend municipal
court at 8:00 a.m. the same date, the officer is entitled to four
(4) hours of overtime).
f) If
the officer’s court assignment begins during his/her regularly scheduled
shift but continues beyond his/her normal duty hours, the officer
will only be entitled to the actual amount of overtime hours worked.
(e.g. If the officer is assigned to work from 10:00 p.m. till 8:00 a.m., and if the
officer’s court assignment begins at 7:30 a.m. and the officer is not dismissed from court until 9:00 a.m., the officer shall receive only one (1) hour of overtime).
g)
All other provisions of Austin Police Department General
Order A402 (Overtime and Compensatory Time) dated March 1, 2002, shall continue to apply except as modified by the
above provisions.
h)
If an officer is called back for unscheduled or scheduled
call back, as defined by the Department, the officer shall receive
a minimum of three (3) hours of compensation at time and one half.
Section 4. Special Preemption.
It is expressly understood and agreed that this Article
shall be entitled to preemption including but not limited to the provisions
of the Texas Local Government Code Chapter 142.0015 and 142.009. back
to top
ARTICLE 9
SPECIAL LEAVE PROVISIONS
Section 1. Emergency
Leave.
Each officer may utilize up to forty (40) hours of paid emergency
leave for a death in the immediate family as defined in the City of
Austin personnel policies.
Section 2. Sick Leave
Donation.
If an officer is in danger of having used all accrued time
(vacation, sick, etc.) due to a serious illness or injury, as defined
by the FMLA, other officers may voluntarily donate up to forty (40)
hours of vacation or sick leave to the ill or injured employee to
avoid loss of pay. No officer shall be permitted to bank more than
four hundred (400) hours of such donated leave within any twelve (12)
month period of time. Donated
leave may only be used for the officer to whom donated.
In the event that all of the donated leave time is not used,
the City shall not be obligated to make any redistribution of banked
hours to the donors. The remaining
unused donated amount shall not be paid on separation.
Section
3. Payment of Leave on Separation.
Separation pay for sick leave will not be paid unless the employee
has at least five (5) years of actual service. The maximum accumulated sick leave paid to an
officer shall be 720 hours. Effective
October
1, 2004,
separation pay will only be paid to officers with at least ten (10)
years of actual service, and accumulated sick leave will be paid to
such officers who separate in good standing (which shall not include
separation in lieu of termination) in accordance with the following:
Maximum sick leave payout will be paid out as indicated below:
Effective
October 1, 2004 920 hours
Effective
October 1, 2005 1020
hours
Effective
October 1, 2006 1120
hours
Effective
October 1, 2007 1400
hours
Section 4. Special Preemption.
It is expressly understood and agreed that this Article
shall be entitled to preemption including but not limited to the provisions
of the Texas Local Government Code Chapter 143.045. back to top
ARTICLE 10
HOLIDAYS AND
VACATION
All non-exempt hourly employees whose
shift begins on December 25 shall continue to be paid time and one
half their regular hourly rate for all hours actually worked for the
entire shift. Exempt employees
who are required by their immediate supervisor to work on Christmas
shall be paid a holiday stipend pursuant to City policy.
The City shall provide by policy for
the application of seniority standards on use of Holidays and Vacation,
but agrees that any policy will apply equal standards, either department-wide
or division-wide.
All sworn officers shall accrue regular vacation leave
at 6.25 hours for each pay period in which benefits accrue. back
to top
ARTICLE 11
ASSOCIATION BUSINESS LEAVE
Section 1. Time Off For Association Business.
An ASSOCIATION business leave time pool (the Pool) shall
be created for the purpose of conducting ASSOCIATION business. Association business is defined as time spent
in Meet and Confer negotiations, adjusting grievances or in dispute
resolution process, attending the annual State CLEAT conference, the
Association's Executive Board meetings, and regular Association business
meetings. It is specifically understood and agreed that
Association pool time shall not be utilized for legislative and/or
political activities at the State or National level, unless they relate
to the wages, rates of pay, hours of employment, or conditions of
work affecting the members of the ASSOCIATION.
At the local level, the use of Association pool time for legislative
and/or political activities shall be limited to raising concerns regarding
officer safety. Association pool time shall not be utilized
for legislative and/or political activities related to any election
of public officials or City Charter amendments.
Association pool time shall not be utilized for legislative
and/or political activities that are sponsored or supported by the
Association's Political Action Committee(s).
It is specifically understood and agreed that no Association
pool time shall be utilized for legislative and/or political activities
at the local, state, or national level that are contrary to the City's
adopted legislative program. No
Association pool time shall be utilized for activities prohibited
by Section 143.086 of Chapter 143 or by the Texas Ethics Commission. Nothing contained in this Subsection is intended
to limit the use of the individual officer's remaining vacation time
by the officer for legislative and/or political activities.
Section 2. Establishment of
Association Leave Time Pool.
The Pool shall be funded by a reduction of annual sick
leave accumulation in the amount of five (5) hours per officer, during
the first pay period of the calendar year.
In the first pay period of each calendar year of this agreement,
the City shall fund the Association Leave Pool in an amount equal
to five (5) hours multiplied by the number of employees in the bargaining
unit on that date. The City will track contributions to and deductions
from the Pool, and will be reimbursed by the Association for the administrative
time involved. The Association shall pay a reimbursement of
nine hundred dollars ($900.00) each contract year prior to September
15.
Once a contribution has been made to the Pool, there
shall be no transfer of the time back into any individual officer's
leave time account, and there will be no cash pay out for any remaining
time in the Pool. Any hours
not used in one (1) year will remain in the Pool to be utilized the
following year. Such pool hours shall never have any cash or
surrender value.
Section 3. Use of Association Business
Leave Time Pool.
All Association business leave will be requested in
writing to the ASSOCIATION President, and submitted in advance for
approval by the Chief, including a determination that the occurrence
for which Pool time is requested meets the requirements established
in Section 1. The Chief may waive the requirement that the
request and approval be in writing.
Requests for use of Pool time shall be made as far in advance
as is practicable. The ASSOCIATION President may be permitted up
to 2080 hours of such leave, under criteria set by the Chief’s office
in a written policy. The ASSOCIATION
President shall account for all leave time taken under such status
through the Chief’s office, which shall be subject to approval on
a monthly basis, and such time shall be subtracted from the Association
leave pool. There shall be no entitlement for overtime
pay for any hours worked on ASSOCIATION business. Such employee may at any time be required to
return to duty if any emergency situation or the best interests of
the Department require; and such employee may additionally be assigned
to special projects, in the discretion of the Chief.
ASSOCIATION Board Members and each of the standing Committee
Chairpersons may each be authorized to utilize up to two hundred and
forty (240) hours from the Pool during the year. No more than one‑half (1/2) of the hours
specified in this Subsection may be used for legislative and/or political
activities as limited in Subsection 1 above.
The ASSOCIATION may request approval for the use of additional
Pool hours for ASSOCIATION members.
Any use of additional Pool time will be solely at the Chief's
discretion. The practice of addressing cadet classes twice
during cadet training, with approval of the time and content by the
Chief, shall continue through the duration of this Agreement. Such time spent addressing cadet classes shall
be deducted from the Pool. This
provision does not exclude the Chief from approving other individuals
or groups to address cadet classes at his discretion, including employee
representative groups with current dues check off.
Section 4. Indemnification.
The ASSOCIATION shall jointly defend the provisions
of this article on behalf of both parties, and shall indemnify the
CITY and any Department of the CITY and hold it harmless against any
and all claims, demands, suits or other forms of liability that may
arise out of, or by reason of, any actions taken by the CITY or any
Department of the CITY for any purpose of complying with provisions
of this article. The Association shall be entitled to select and direct
counsel for such defense, but shall reasonably cooperate with counsel
designated by the City Attorney to participate. back
to top
ARTICLE 12
ASSOCIATION COMMUNICATION
The ASSOCIATION'S access to City facilities and equipment
to communicate with its membership shall include the use of one (1)
bulletin board installed at each substation and satellite office,
one (1) in the central Criminal Investigations Bureau report writing
room, and one (1) in one other location agreed to by the ASSOCIATION
and the Chief, and Departmental pagers. Use of pagers shall be in
accordance with written Departmental policy, or shall otherwise be
approved in advance by the Chief’s office. Use of department equipment to create or send
email on ASSOCIATION business is not allowed.
The design and placement of the bulletin boards shall be approved
in advance by the Chief or his designee.
Section 1. Guidelines for Association Bulletin Boards.
The following guidelines shall apply to materials posted
on the bulletin boards:
a)
There shall
be no personal attacks or inflammatory statements.
b)
All materials
shall be directed toward dissemination of ASSOCIATION information.
c)
Any concerns
about the content of posted material shall be brought to the attention
of the ASSOCIATION'S executive board for review and adjustment as
soon as the concerns are noticed.
The Chief shall direct the objectionable material to be removed
from the bulletin board until final determination.
d)
In any case,
the Police Chief retains the final decision as to whether ASSOCIATION
material may be posted on bulletin boards.
At no time shall the bulletin boards contain any political
endorsement, whether at the local, state or federal level. back
to top
ARTICLE 13
PROMOTIONS
Section 1.
Corporal and Detective.
Eligibility
A police officer shall be eligible to sit for the Corporal’s
promotional examination after completing six (6) years from the date
of initial commission with the APD.
A police officer continues to be able to sit for the Detective’s
promotional examination after completing two (2) years from the date
of initial commission with the APD.
However, beginning January 1, 2006 the time in rank requirement to be eligible to sit
for the promotional examination shall be changed to five (5) years
for both Corporal and Detective.
The job description for the Corporal rank shall include
acting as a supervisor when a Sergeant is not available, conducting
assigned investigation and other duties as determined by the Chief
and set out in the job description and general orders.
A Corporal and Detective become eligible for promotion
to Sergeant after two (2) years in rank. A Corporal shall be entitled to higher classification
pay under the same criteria set forth in Department policy then applicable
to any other supervisor temporarily working in the next higher rank.
Positions in the ranks of Corporal and Detective shall
be filled from an eligibility list created by a promotional procedure
consisting of a written examination conducted in accordance with this
Article.
Written examination
points:
(See Section 5)
Maximum Exam Points 100
Maximum Education Points 2
Maximum Seniority Points +15*
Total Maximum Points:
117**
*Seniority points calculated at 1 point per year of
service, and shall be prorated for partial years.
**Formula shall
be carried to 3 decimal points and rounded up from .0005. Police Civil Service tie‑breaking rules
will be applied if necessary.
Seniority
Each officer shall be entitled to up to a maximum of
fifteen (15) seniority points to be added to the written exam
score, equivalent to one (1) point per year of service, which shall
be prorated for partial years.
Education
The following
education points shall be added to each candidates score, and shall
only apply to college degrees from an accredited college or university,
meeting the accreditation standard referenced in Article 7 Section
10 for education incentive pay. No
cumulative points shall be allowed for more than one degree or Certification.
Add .5 point for 60 college credits
Add 1.0 point for Bachelor Degree or Master Police Officer
Certificate
Add 2.0 points for Masters Degree
Section 2. Sergeant.
Promotional Procedure for Rank of Sergeant
Positions in the rank of Sergeant shall be filled from
an eligibility list created by a promotional procedure consisting
of a written examination and an Assessment Center conducted in accordance with this Article.
After the Assessment Center scoring has been completed, for the rank of Sergeant the eligibility list
shall be calculated as follows:
Written examination
points: Assessment Center:
(See Section 5)
Maximum exam points 100
Assessment Center points 100
Maximum seniority points +15* Maximum education points + 2
Total maximum points:
115 Total maximum points: 102
*Seniority points calculated at 1 point per year of
service, and shall be prorated for partial years.
PROMOTION
ELIGIBILITY LIST FORMULA:
(Written examination
points + seniority points) / 115 x 100 x .50 adjustment factor
+
(Assessment Center Points + Education Points) / 102
x 100 x .50 adjustment factor
=
Total points for promotion list**
**Formula shall be
carried to 3 decimal points and rounded up from .0005.
Police Civil Service tie‑breaking rules will be applied
if necessary.
Seniority
Each officer shall be entitled to up to a maximum of
fifteen (15) seniority points to be added to the written exam
score, equivalent to one (1) point per year of service, which shall
be prorated for partial years.
Education
The following
education points shall be added to each candidate’s score. These points shall only be added to the assessment
score in accordance with the formula below, and shall only apply to
college degrees from an accredited college or university, meeting
the accreditation standard referenced in Article 7 Section 10 for
education incentive pay. No
cumulative points shall be allowed for more than one degree or Certification.
Add .5 point for 60 college credits
Add 1.0 point for Bachelor Degree or Master Police Officer
Certificate
Add 2.0 points for Masters Degree
Section 3. Lieutenant.
Promotional Procedure for Rank of Lieutenant
Positions in the rank of Lieutenant shall be filled
from an eligibility list created by a promotional procedure consisting
of a written examination and an Assessment Center conducted in accordance with this Article.
After the Assessment Center scoring has been completed, for the rank of Lieutenant the eligibility
list shall be calculated as follows:
Written
examination points:
Assessment Center:
(See Section 5)
Maximum exam points 100
Assessment Center points 100
Maximum seniority points +15* Maximum education points + 2
Total maximum points:
115 Total maximum points: 102
*Seniority points calculated at 1 point per year of
service, and shall be prorated for partial years.
PROMOTION
ELIGIBILITY LIST FORMULA:
(Written examination
points + seniority points) / 115 x 100 x .50 adjustment factor
+
(Assessment Center Points + Education Points) / 102
x 100 x .50 adjustment factor
=
Total points for promotion list**
**Formula shall be
carried to 3 decimal points and rounded up from .0005.
Police Civil Service tie‑breaking rules will be applied
if necessary.
Seniority
Each officer shall be entitled to up to a maximum of
fifteen (15) seniority points to be added to the written exam
score, equivalent to one (1) point per year of service, which shall
be prorated for partial years.
Education
The following education points shall be added to each candidate’s
score. These points shall only be added to the assessment
score in accordance with the formula below, and shall only apply to
college degrees from an accredited college or university, meeting
the accreditation standard referenced in Article 7 Section 10 for
education incentive pay. No
cumulative points shall be allowed for more than one degree.
Add 1.0 point for Bachelor Degree
Add 2.0 points for Masters Degree
Section 4.
Commanders.
Promotional Procedure for Rank of Commander
Positions in the rank of Commander shall be filled from
an eligibility list created by a promotional procedure consisting
of a written examination and an Assessment Center conducted in accordance with this Article.
After the Assessment Center scoring has been completed, for the rank of Commander the eligibility
list shall be calculated as follows:
Written
examination points:
Assessment Center:
(See Section 5)
Maximum exam points 100
Assessment Center points 100
Maximum seniority points +15* Maximum education points + 2
Total maximum points:
115 Total maximum points: 102
*Seniority points calculated at 1 point per year of
service, and shall be prorated for partial years.
PROMOTION
ELIGIBILITY LIST FORMULA:
(Written examination
points + seniority points) / 115 x 100 x .50 adjustment factor
+
(Assessment Center Points + Education Points) / 102
x 100 x .50 adjustment factor
=
Total points for promotion list**
**Formula shall be
carried to 3 decimal points and rounded up from .0005.
Police Civil Service tie‑breaking rules will be applied
if necessary.
Seniority
Each officer shall be entitled to up to a maximum of
fifteen (15) seniority points to be added to the written exam
score, equivalent to one (1) point per year of service, which shall
be prorated for partial years.
Education
The following education points shall be added to each candidate’s
score. These points shall only be added to the assessment
score in accordance with the formula below, and shall only apply to
college degrees from an accredited college or university, meeting
the accreditation standard referenced in Article 7 Section 10 for
education incentive pay. No
cumulative points shall be allowed for more than one degree.
Add 1.0 point for Bachelor Degree
Add 2.0 points for Masters Degree
Section 5. Written
Examination for Promotion to the Ranks of Corporal, Detective, Sergeant,
Lieutenant, and Commander.
All candidates for the ranks of Corporal, Detective,
Sergeant, Lieutenant, and Commander shall first take a written examination.
The maximum score for the written examination shall be one hundred
(100) points. The written examination
shall consist of questions relating to the duties of the rank to be
filled, as contained in reading material selected by the Chief of
Police. The CITY may engage an independent consultant
to professionally develop the written examination questions after
consultations with the Human Resources Department (HRD). The CITY will make a reasonable effort to have
the written examination validated.
The examination may be validated before or after the examination
is given. Prior to being administered,
the finalized examination shall be kept in a safe and secure manner.
The CITY shall make reasonable efforts to provide a
six (6) month study time window prior to promotional examinations,
but it is recognized that expiration or exhaustion of a list may necessitate
an earlier examination.
Section
6. Assessment Center Process for
Promotion to the Ranks of Sergeant, Lieutenant or Commander.
Officers who pass the Sergeant’s, Lieutenant's or Commander's
written promotional examination with a score of seventy percent (70%)
or higher will proceed to the next step of the examination process,
which is an Assessment Center.
Prior to the written test being administered, the Chief
shall establish assessment criteria based on job content and responsibility.
The Human Resources Department will generate a list of consultants,
and will review that list with the Chief, who will approve the list.
The Chief shall also appoint three (3) members to serve on
an Assessment Center Review Committee (ACRC), plus one (1) alternate. The ASSOCIATION shall also select three (3)
individuals to serve on the ACRC and one (1) alternate. All ACRC members shall be selected from the
tested rank or above. The ACRC
shall meet and consider the list of consultants approved by the Chief
and select the Assessment Center Consultant from the list which may
be subject to Council approval, pursuant to City purchasing policies
and procedures.
After the Assessment Center Consultant
has been selected, the Consultant will orient the ACRC. The Consultant will confer with both the Chief
and the ACRC on the needs or issues affecting the design of the Assessment Center. Any
input from the ASSOCIATION will be summarized by the ACRC and made
available to anyone who requests it.
The Consultant shall make all final decisions concerning the
design and implementation of the Assessment Center.
The consultant will design the Assessment Center from among the following exercises:
In‑Basket
Problem Solving/Analysis
Written and Oral Resumes/Structured Interviews
Role‑Playing
Memo/Report Writing
Oral Presentation/Plan Preparation
Staff Meeting
Special Event/Operations.
The consultant is not required to utilize all of the
exercises, but may select the exercises or combine the listed exercises
into one or more exercises that are best suited for the particular
rank.
The Consultant also selects the assessors,
who shall meet the following criteria:
a)
Active duty,
sworn officers of similar rank
to the promotion, or above, from cities with a population of 200,000
or greater;
b)
Shall not reside
in Austin;
c)
Shall not be
related to any candidates for promotion;
d)
Shall not be
known to, beyond mere acquaintance, any candidates for promotion;
e)
Shall have two
(2) years of experience in the promoted or equivalent rank; and
f)
Shall not be
a current or former employee of the City of Austin.
The Consultant shall conduct an orientation for candidates
prior to administering the Assessment Center. The Consultant may deem the orientation
mandatory, and all candidates must attend in order to participate,
if it is declared mandatory. If
the consultant deems orientation to be mandatory, then at least two
(2) orientations shall be scheduled with one in the morning and one
in the afternoon. If a mandatory orientation is scheduled during an
officer's work time, he/she will be permitted to attend.
The assessors selected by the Consultant will assess
the candidates for the rank. The assessors shall award up to one hundred
(100) points to each candidate participating in the assessment center. The assessment sessions will be videotaped,
and candidates may review their own session pursuant to procedures
established by Human Resources provided that candidates are given
up to four (4) hours, which may be provided in smaller increments
of time, to review their assessment session. The Human Resources Department
shall make available blocks of time for officers to review examination
results from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m., and at least
two (2) evening options until 10:00 p.m. shall be provided. However, these
time periods need not be kept available or staffed unless the times
are reserved in advance. Examination
reviews will be conducted on the officer’s off-duty time. Copies of the videotapes will not be given to
the candidate. Nothing in the
assessment center process may be appealed either to the Police Civil
Service Commission, hearing examiner, or the District Court.
Section
7.
Eligibility Lists for the Ranks of Corporal, Detective, Sergeant,
Lieutenant, and Commander.
All promotional eligibility lists created under this
Article shall be constructed, with the highest total score being ranked
number one and descending in numerical order.
All eligibility lists shall be valid for
eighteen (18) months from the date that the eligibility list is finalized.
Section 8.
Appeals Criteria Committee.
An Appeals
Criteria Committee (ACC) shall continue to determine the criteria
for what may be appealed to the Police Civil Service Commission following
all written promotional examinations.
The ACC shall establish appeal criteria which will be used
for all written examinations held during the term of this Agreement.
The ACC, composed of seven (7) individuals, shall be appointed
as follows:
a)
Three (3) members
appointed by ASSOCIATION, each having taken at least one (1) promotional
exam;
b)
Two (2) members
appointed by the Chief of Police, each having taken at least one (1)
promotional exam;
c)
One (1) member
appointed by the Director of the Human Resources Department; and
d)
One (1) member
appointed by the Chair of the Police Civil Service Commission.
A simple majority of the ACC shall approve the criteria. The Chief may reconvene the ACC if, after an
eligibility list has been established, it appears that clarification
or modification of the criteria is warranted.
The criteria approved by the ACC shall not be appealable to
either the Police Civil Service Commission, a hearing examiner, or
to the District Court.
Section 9.
Appeal Process After Written Examination.
Any officer who has taken a written promotional examination
may, within seven (7) City
of Austin business days of the posting of the written promotional
exam results, review his/her examination results.
The process shall be established by the Human Resources Department;
provided, however, that each officer who has taken a promotional examination
may have up to four (4) hours to review his/her examination, write,
and submit the appeal, if any, which must be based on the appeal criteria
approved by the ACC. Once an appeal is filed, it shall be assigned
a number and processed anonymously.
The officer may obtain a copy of his or her appeal. The Human
Resources Division shall make available blocks of time for officers
to review examination results from 8:00
a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and at least two (2) evening options until 10:00 p.m. shall be provided.
However, these time periods need not be kept available or staffed
unless the times are reserved in advance. Examination reviews will
be conducted on the officer's off‑duty time.
There will be no appeal to the Police Civil Service Commission,
a hearing examiner, or to the District Court of any facet of the examination
review process.
Section 10. Review by Employee Review Committee.
An Employee Review Committee (ERC) will be appointed
to screen written examination appeals to the Police Civil Service
Commission, applying the criteria established by the ACC to determine
which appeals should be rejected because they do not meet the criteria. Assuring for diversity as is practical and
possible the ERC shall be comprised of five (5) members as follows:
Four (4) officers of the rank of the promotional exam or higher,
two (2) each appointed by the ASSOCIATION and the Chief of Police;
and
One (1) member appointed by HRD.
Appeals may advance from the ERC to the Police Civil
Service Commission by a vote of a simple majority of the ERC. The
ERC will not make any statement, assertion, or recommendation regarding
the validity of an appeal or subsequent Police Civil Service Commission
action. There will be no State District Court appeal
of the ERC's examination appeal determinations or from the Police
Civil Service Commission's written examination appeal decisions, except
an appeal alleging the CITY's failure to validate the written examination.
Section 11. Special Preemption.
It is expressly
understood and agreed that the provisions in Chapter 143.036(d) and
(e) and 143.014(f) of the Local Government Code prescribing time limits
for filling vacancies at the rank of Sergeant
or above shall be expanded to one hundred and twenty (120)
days from the date the vacancy occurs during the term of this Agreement.
Section 12. Committee on the Assessment Center Process.
The CITY and the ASSOCIATION shall each appoint two
(2) persons to a committee that shall schedule a meeting with the
participants in each Assessment Center process to discuss the strengths and weaknesses perceived by the participants,
after completion of the process. The
Committee may recommend changes in the procedures set out in this
Agreement.
Section 13. Military Promotions/Demotions.
The following changes are made to Sections
143.031 and 143.072 of the Texas Local Government Code:
a)
Section
143.072(c). When an officer
is promoted as the result of a vacancy created by a military leave
of absence, when the officer on military leave returns to active duty
in the Department, the person who filled the most recent vacancy at
that rank shall be the one who is demoted to the next lowest classification
and placed on a reinstatement list.
b)
The same result
applies to all other promotions in lower ranks which resulted from
the first promotion and subsequent demotion.
c)
Time spent on a reinstatement
list shall not be considered a break in service for civil service
purposes, including, but not limited to eligibility for future promotional
examinations.
d)
This
Section shall be retroactive in all respects to September 1, 2001.
e)
All
other provisions of Sections 143.031 and 143.072 not specifically
changed by this Agreement shall remain in effect.
Section
14. General Preemption.
It is expressly understood and agreed that
this Article shall be entitled to preemption including but not limited
to the provisions of Subchapter B of the Texas Local Government
Code Chapter 143. back to top
ARTICLE 14
INITIAL HIRING
PROCESS
Any individual who wishes to be considered for employment
as a cadet in the Austin Police Department must complete the following
application and examination process.
Section 1. Submission of Proper
Application.
In order to be considered for the position of cadet,
each applicant must first submit a proper application as defined by
the Department. A proper application
shall include, but not be limited to, information on personal history,
criminal history, driving record and age.
The information submitted shall be used by the Police Department
to determine whether the applicant meets the minimum qualifications
to proceed to the testing phase of the process.
The application expires twelve (12) months after a proper application,
as described above, is received by the Police Department unless circumstances
result in a delay in scheduling or start of a cadet class, in which
case the Chief of Police may extend the twelve (12) month deadline
for an additional six (6) months.
Section 2. Maximum Age of Applicants.
For applicants who have no prior military or police
experience, the maximum age for application to the cadet position
shall be forty (40) years old. For
applicants with prior military or police experience, the maximum age
limit shall be forty‑five (45) years old.
Section 3. Testing of Applicants.
a) Academy cadets
will be hired from a roster created by a testing process, administered
under the Austin Police Department.
Applicants will be ranked on the roster based on composite
scores in a multi‑part testing process, including a written
examination and oral interview board.
The list of applicants shall be established with the
following percentage weight applied to each portion of the testing
process:
Written Test
45%
Oral Interview Board 55%
Total Points: 100%
b) The written
examination contents may include, among other things, testing of written
communication skills, reading comprehension, accuracy of observations
and biographical inventory. Each
applicant shall also be required to undergo an oral interview board, as provided in subsection 4.
c) Additional
points may be awarded only to an applicant with a passing composite
score as follows:
Two (2) years prior police experience 3 points
Two (2) years prior military experience 2 points
Thirty (30) or more college hours* 2 points
Bachelors or Master’s Degree* 3 points
Certified in second language* 3 points
*No cumulative points for education or more than one
additional language are allowed. The Chief shall decide what specific
languages will qualify for the extra second language points prior
to the posting of each test date, and the applicant is responsible
for becoming certified.
Additional points, if any, shall be added to the applicant's
total points.
d) All applicants
will be required to have completed a minimum of thirty (30) college
hours in order to be eligible for consideration. The CITY, at its
sole discretion, may waive all or part of the college hours requirement
and permit substitution of up to two (2) years of prior police or
military experience. After completing the testing phase, all applicants
will be required to pass a background check, polygraph and physical
ability test, which shall be a pass/fail grade.
A failing grade on any of the items listed in this subsection
shall disqualify the applicant from further consideration. After a
conditional offer of employment has been made, the applicant shall
undergo medical and psychological examinations.
The recruiting staff is specifically authorized to recruit,
administer written tests, and process applicants in the field.
Section 4. Oral Interview Board.
Before being further considered for employment, each
applicant who has been placed in the eligible applicant roster and
who has not been disqualified pursuant to subsection 3(d) above, will
undergo an oral interview before the Oral Interview Board, which
will be comprised of members of the Austin Police Department appointed
by the Chief. In the event the Oral Interview Board does not
pass an applicant, the applicant's name will be removed from the current
eligible applicant roster.
Section 5. Effect on Present Cadet Classes.
It is specifically understood and agreed that the hiring
process set out in this Agreement shall not apply to persons hired
before the effective date of this Agreement.
Section 6. Extended
Probationary Period.
The “at will” probationary period of individuals filling
beginning positions in the police department shall begin, under this
agreement, on the date the cadet receives his/her commission and shall
end at the expiration of fifteen (15) months. The probationary period
of any cadet that already holds a commission prior to entering the
police academy shall begin on the date the officer receives their
first assignment after successful completion of the academy, and shall
end at the expiration of fifteen (15) months. However, any leave taken
by a probationary police officer during this probationary time period,
including but not limited to injury leave, FMLA leave, sick leave,
shall extend this probationary period by the length of the leave taken.
(Approved vacation leave other than FMLA will not so extend
the probationary period.)
Section 7. Defense of Actions.
In the event an applicant files an action against the
CITY and the ASSOCIATION on account of the operation of Article 14,
the City agrees to jointly defend on behalf of both parties the validity
of this provision adopted by both parties, with counsel of the CITY’s
choice. This provision does not preclude the ASSOCIATION from retaining
its own defense counsel, at its expense and the CITY shall reasonably
cooperate with counsel designated by the ASSOCIATION to participate.
Section 8. Special Preemption.
It
is expressly understood and agreed that this Article shall be entitled
to preemption, including but not limited to the provisions of the
Texas Local Government Code §143.022 through §143.027. back
to top
ARTICLE 15
DRUG TESTING
Section 1. Commitment to an Effective Drug Interdiction
Program.
The CITY and the ASSOCIATION agree that officers may
be called upon in hazardous situations without warning, and that it
is imperative to the interest of the officers and the public to ensure
that officers are not substance impaired. In order to further their
joint interest in protecting officers and the public, the CITY and
the ASSOCIATION agree to mandatory drug testing as described in this
section. The CITY and the ASSOCIATION have a mutual interest
in ensuring that drug impaired officers do not perform law enforcement
duties. The CITY and the ASSOCIATION
are committed to the principle that the mandatory drug testing policy
for officers is designed and shall be administered to result in disciplinary
action only against those officers who have violated the Police Department's
rules, regulations, policies and procedures.
Section 2. Random Testing.
One hundred percent (100%) of officers at all ranks,
including the Chief, shall be susceptible to mandatory testing for
illegal drugs and controlled substances during each calendar year
on a fair and impartial statistical basis at the CITY's expense. The
fair and impartial statistical basis (in which each officer has an
equal chance of being selected during a calendar year) shall be by
a non‑discriminatory computerized program operated and certified
as non‑discriminatory by an independent firm hired by the CITY,
and the officer shall be tested upon being selected by the computer.
Upon notice of selection for random testing, any officer
shall provide a urine sample in accordance with the policy or protocol
established by the testing laboratory. Failure to provide a sample
shall be equivalent to insubordination and may be the basis for suspension
or indefinite suspension.
Section 3. Assurance of Accurate Results.
Officers shall have the right to request that their
urine sample be stored in case of legal disputes. The urine sample
will be submitted to the designated testing facility where a sample
will be maintained for the period of one year. Officers may, at their
own expense, request to have a test administered at an approved physician's
office accompanied by the testing personnel provided such testing
is administered within eight (8) hours after notification by the Chief.
Drug testing shall consist of a two‑step procedure:
1.
Initial screening test.
2.
Confirmation test.
Should a confirmation test be required, the test procedure
will be technologically different and more sensitive than the initial
screening test. Officers shall
be provided with a notice of the result and may obtain a copy of the
actual laboratory result upon request to the Lieutenant assigned responsibility
as Drug Testing Coordinator.
The CITY and the ASSOCIATION agree that only an appropriately
certified laboratory should conduct drug testing. The laboratory selected
shall be experienced and capable of quality control documentation,
chain of custody and have a demonstrated technical expertise and proficiency
in urine analysis and shall comply with all requirements of an appropriately
certified laboratory. The CITY shall require any laboratory selected
for collecting samples to conduct a background investigation on those
laboratory personnel involved in the collecting or handling of an
unsealed sample. In addition, the CITY shall require any laboratory
involved in collecting samples to use only employees who have not
been arrested by officers of the Austin Police Department or convicted
of a felony or misdemeanor crime involving dishonest conduct or possession
of illegal drugs to be involved in collecting or handling of an unsealed
sample collected from an officer. In the event that the laboratory
that collects the initial samples is not the same laboratory that
conducts the actual testing of those samples, only the laboratory
that collects the initial samples must comply with the background
and criminal history provision of this Agreement. Test results shall
be inadmissible in any administrative disciplinary hearing if it is
determined that the laboratory collecting samples failed to conduct
a background investigation on the laboratory personnel involved in
collecting or handling the unsealed sample which resulted in a positive
test result.
All records pertaining to the Department-required drug
tests shall remain confidential except to the extent used in a disciplinary
appeal. Drug test results and records shall be stored in a locked
file under the control of the Drug Coordinator, under the supervision
of the Chief, will maintain original copies submitted by the laboratory.
No access to these files shall be allowed without written approval
of the Chief.
Section 4. Testing on Reasonable Suspicion.
Nothing in this Article shall be construed to prohibit
the Chief from conducting a drug test on an officer, or a search of
any areas in which the officer does not have a personal privacy expectation,
based upon reasonable suspicion in accordance with the guidelines
as set forth in Department policy for such by actions.
Such actions may be taken upon the agreement of any two supervisors
that there is a reasonable basis for a suspicion that:
a)
An officer is presently using or under the influence
of illegal drugs or inhalants
b)
An officer has possession of illegal drugs or inhalants
c)
An officer has been associated with or involved with
others who were using or under the influence of illegal drugs or inhalants,
or who were in possession of same, which association or involvement
was not authorized or required in connection with any law enforcement
duty, under circumstances which reasonably indicate
participation or complicity with, or protection of such other individuals
d)
Any conduct or situation described in a-c immediately
above involving alcohol, while on duty, or which results in on-duty
impairment.
Section 5. Definitions.
For the purposes of this Article:
"Drug testing" shall be defined as the compulsory
production and submission of a urine sample by an officer for chemical
analysis to detect the presence of prohibited drug usage, in connection
with the random testing process set forth herein; and production or
submission of urine, blood, or hair sample for a required test based
on the reasonable suspicion standards set forth herein. back
to top
ARTICLE 16
CITIZEN OVERSIGHT OF
THE AUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Section 1. Citizen Oversight.
a) Citizen
Oversight means the process which incorporates citizen input into
the administrative review of conduct of APD officers and the review
of the Austin Police Department’s policies and procedures.
The City of Austin may provide for Citizen Oversight of the Austin Police
Department. Citizen Oversight
may include an Office of the Police Monitor and a Volunteer Citizen’s
Panel. The City agrees that there will be no parallel
process created in addition to the one contemplated by these provisions.
b) The purpose
of Citizen Oversight is:
1. to assure
timely, fair, impartial, and objective administrative review of complaints against police officers, while protecting
the individual rights of officers and citizens;
2. to provide
an independent and objective review of the policies and procedures
of the Austin Police Department; and
3. to provide
a primary, but not exclusive, location for accepting administrative
complaints of officer misconduct.
c) Except as
otherwise provided by this Agreement, the Chief of Police retains
all management rights and authority over the process of administrative
investigation of alleged misconduct by APD officers that could result
in disciplinary action.
d) The Citizen
Oversight process, regardless of its name or structure, shall not
be used or permitted to gather evidence, contact or interview witnesses,
or otherwise independently investigate a complaint of misconduct by
an officer. There shall be no legal or administrative requirement,
including but not limited to subpoena power or an order from the City
Manager or the Department, that an officer appear before or present
evidence to any individual, panel, committee, group, or forum of any
type involved in Citizen Oversight. This provision has no application to any Independent
Investigation authorized by the Chief of Police or the City Manager,
regardless of whether the Independent Investigation was recommended
by a Panel or Police Monitor, or to any hearing of an appeal of disciplinary
action pursuant to this Agreement and/or Chapter 143 of the Texas
Local Government Code. Police
officers remain subject to orders or subpoenas to appear and provide
testimony or evidence in such investigations or hearings.
Section 2. The Office of the Police Monitor (“OPM”).
a) The Police
Monitor will have unfettered access to the Internal Affairs investigation
process, except as provided herein. The Police Monitor may inquire of the Commander
of the Internal Affairs Division or the Chief of Police, or the Chief’s
designee, as to the status of any pending IAD investigation.
b) The OPM
shall not gather evidence, contact or interview witnesses (except
the complainant as provided herein), or otherwise independently investigate
a complaint. The OPM shall
not have the authority to subpoena witnesses.
There shall be no administrative requirement, including but
not limited to an order from the City Manager or the Department, that
a police officer appear or present evidence to the Police Monitor.
The OPM may obtain the following information in connection
with the filing of a complaint of officer misconduct:
1. the complainant’s
personal information;
2. the nature
of the complaint;
3. witness information;
4. the incident
location, date, and time; and
5. the APD officer(s)
involved.
c) Personnel
from the OPM shall not encourage or insist upon the filing of a complaint.
d) Only the
Police Monitor or the Assistant Police Monitor may attend an interview
of the officer who is the subject of the investigation or administrative
inquiry. At the conclusion of any interview, the OPM
representative may take the IAD investigator aside and request that
the investigator ask additional questions.
Whether such information is sought in any witness interview
is within the discretion of the IAD investigator.
e) Neither
the Police Monitor nor the Internal Affairs Representative(s) may
remain in the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) meeting while the chain
of command discusses the final classification and/or appropriate discipline,
if any, to be imposed. The
final classification of an allegation of misconduct is within the
sole discretion of the Chief of Police, subject to the officer’s right
of appeal of any discipline imposed as provided by Chapter 143 of
the Texas Local Government Code and this agreement.
Section 3. Volunteer Citizen Panel (“Panel”).
A. Function
1. The Panel
shall serve to make recommendations to the Chief of Police as provided in this Article, and in addition
to review individual cases of officer conduct
as authorized in this Article.
Panel members shall perform their duties in a fair and objective
manner.
2. The Panel
shall select a Chair for the panel who shall serve a one-year term.
The Panel shall provide a public report setting forth the basis and
concerns of the Panel supporting any recommendation for an Independent
Investigation. In addition, the Panel shall provide a public
report setting forth the Panel’s conclusions and recommendations after
its review of any Independent Investigation.
B. Qualifications
To be eligible for appointment to the Panel, applicants
must not have a felony criminal conviction, received deferred adjudication
for a felony, or be under felony indictment. Prior to appointment,
Panel members must submit to a criminal background investigation to
determine their eligibility to serve on the Panel.
A felony conviction, felony indictment, or felony deferred
adjudication, after appointment, shall result in the immediate removal
of the member from the Panel by the City Manager.
C. Training
To serve on the Panel, each member must complete the
following training within 180 days of their appointment. Failure to timely complete the required training
shall automatically result in the immediate removal of the member
from the Panel. The minimum
training requirements are as follows:
1. Attend a two
to three (2-3) day training tailored from parts of the Austin Police Academy.
2. Attend six
(6) hours of training provided by the Internal Affairs Division.
3. Attend the
Citizen’s Police Academy.
D. Resign
to Run
Any person involved in the citizen oversight process
as a Panel member, who files for public elective office shall immediately
resign from their position in the citizen oversight process, and failing
such resignation shall be immediately removed by the City Manager.
E. Panel
Review Process
1. Not later
than thirty (30) calendar days after the mailing of the notice of
the outcome of the investigation to the complainant, the complainant
may request that the Police Monitor refer the complaint to the Panel.
2. Without a
complainant’s request, only the following cases may be referred to
the Panel:
a) a “Critical
Incident” as defined this Article;
b) the appearance
of a pattern of serious misconduct by the officer involved;
c) the appearance
of a pattern of department-wide misconduct;
d) the appearance
of serious official misconduct by one or more members of the Department;
e) the appearance
of bias based misconduct; or
f) the appearance
of issue(s) to be addressed by policy, procedure, or training recommendations.
F. Nature
of Proceedings
a) The review
of any case by the Panel shall not be conducted as a hearing or trial. Except for the receipt of public input/communications
as provided by this Section or an Independent Investigation authorized
by this Article, the Panel shall not gather evidence, contact or interview
witnesses, or otherwise independently investigate a complaint.
The Panel shall not have the authority to subpoena witnesses.
There shall be no administrative requirement, including but
not limited to an order from the City Manager or the Department, that
a police officer appear or present evidence to the Panel.
The Panel shall immediately forward any information or evidence
of which it becomes aware to the Chief of Police through the Police
Monitor.
b) A quorum shall
be established prior to beginning the review of any case by the Panel.
c) Not less than
five (5) working days prior to a Panel meeting, the OPM shall provide
the Internal Affairs Division and the individual designated by the
president of the bargaining agent as the Panel liaison, with a copy
of the Panel meeting agenda. The
Panel shall not take action upon or receive public input/communications
concerning any case or issue not listed as an agenda item.
The Internal Affairs Division shall promptly notify any officer
who is the subject of a complaint listed as an agenda item as to the
scheduled Panel meeting. Notice of special meetings shall be handled
in a similar manner, unless circumstances require a shorter notice,
in which case the notice shall be issued as soon as the special meeting
is scheduled.
d) By virtue
of its purely advisory role, the Panel is not a governmental body
and is not subject to the Open Meetings Act.
Those portions of the meeting during which public input/communication
is accepted shall be open to the public and recorded by video and
audio cassette tape.
G. Private
Session
a) Prior to receiving
any communication from the complainant or any other public input/communications,
the Panel may meet in private session to be briefed concerning the
facts of the particular case to be reviewed. Either the Police Monitor or the IAD representative
shall present to the Panel the information obtained from the IAD investigation.
Members of the Panel may be provided with READ ONLY electronic
access to all or part of the IAD files during these presentations.
b) An APD officer
designated by the president of the bargaining agent and one individual
from the Internal Affairs Division shall be present during the Panel
private session case briefing, including the portion of the private
session described in subsection “e” below. The bargaining agent’s
representative will not participate in the briefing and is present
only as an observer. The bargaining representative may not be involved
in the case as a witness, investigator, relative, or officer in the
chain of command. Information
in the possession of the APD officer as a result of participation
in such briefing shall not be disclosed or revealed other than as
necessary as a part of official Association business in monitoring
and enforcing this agreement, or in the normal course of dispute resolution
processes under this agreement.
c) Panel members
shall have full access to all administrative investigative and disciplinary
files necessary to perform their functions under this agreement.
Panel members may ask questions and obtain specific facts,
details and information from the Police Monitor, IAD, or the Chief’s
office.
d) During any
private Panel briefing, the presenter should exercise discretion and
omit information from the briefing that the Police Monitor deems to
be irrelevant to the citizen’s complaint, as well as information of
a highly personal nature that would constitute an unwarranted invasion
of an individual’s personal privacy interests.
e) Upon completion
of the Panel case briefing, the complainant shall be allowed to address
the Panel. The police officer
who is the subject of the complaint may, but is not required to attend
and listen to the address by the complainant.
If the complainant is anxious or intimidated by the presence
of the officer, the Panel shall videotape the complainant’s address
to the Panel, and allow the officer to view and respond to the taped
statement outside the complainant’s presence.
Other than the complainant and the responding police officer,
only those persons authorized to attend the Panel case briefing may
be present during this portion of the Panel meeting.
H. Public
Session and Comments
a) After any
address by the complainant and/or responding police officer, the Panel
shall meet in public session to receive any additional public input/communications
concerning the case under review.
During the public session, the Police Monitor shall take precautions
to prevent discussion of the facts of the particular case and to prevent
the public session from being used as a forum to gather evidence,
interview witnesses, or otherwise independently investigate a complaint.
Any individual who indicates that he has new or additional
evidence concerning the particular case shall be referred to the Chief
of Police or his designee. The
rules that apply to citizen communications with the City Council shall
apply to the public session of the Panel meetings.
b) The Police
Monitor, in consultation with the Panel, shall set the time limits
for such proceedings.
I. Deliberations
After receiving public input, if any, the Panel shall
discuss the particular case under review in private session. The Police Monitor and/or the Assistant Police
Monitor may be present during such discussion. No other individual may be present unless, the
panel requests further information.
J. Action
and Recommendations
a) At the conclusion
of the review process set forth above, the Panel, upon a majority
vote of its total members, may make the following recommendations
to Chief of Police:
1. further
investigation by the Department is warranted;
2. Department
policies warrant review and/or change;
3. an “Independent
Investigation” is warranted; or
4. a written,
non-binding recommendation on discipline
A recommendation
on discipline is limited to cases involving a “critical incident”
as defined in this Article. The
Panel shall not take action or make recommendations not authorized
by this Article.
b) After the
Citizen Oversight process has been completed for a "critical
incident," as that phrase is defined herein, the individuals involved in the Citizen Oversight
process may make non-binding disciplinary recommendations to the Chief
of Police. The final decision
as to appropriate discipline is within the sole discretion of the
Chief of Police, subject to the officer’s right of appeal of any discipline
imposed as provided by Chapter 143 of the Texas Local Government Code
and this agreement. The objectives of the process being served by
a written recommendation as to discipline, neither the OPM employees
nor individual members of the Panel shall publicly express agreement
or disagreement with the final disciplinary decision of the Chief,
other than as set forth in the written recommendation.
Any such recommendation shall not be publicly disclosed prior
to the Chief’s final decision. After
the Chief of Police has made his final decision, any such citizen
or internal monitor recommendations shall be subject to public disclosure
to the extent permitted by law. Violation
of this provision shall be subject to the dispute resolution process
set forth in Section 7 of this Article, but a Panel member shall not
be subject to permanent removal from the Panel except upon a second
violation of this standard.
c) For purposes
of this Section, the term “Critical Incident” shall mean:
1. An alleged use of force or other action by
an Austin Police Officer that directly results in serious bodily injury
or death (The definition of “serious bodily injury” found in the Texas Penal Code, Section 1.07(a)(46) will apply.);
2. A death
in custody; or
3. An officer
involved shooting.
d) Members must
attend the meeting and hear the merits of the case in order to vote. The Panel’s recommendations shall be reduced
to writing. The Panel’s written
recommendations shall explain the Panel’s issues(s) or concern(s).
e) The Police
Monitor shall consult with the Panel in formulating any recommendations
to the Chief of Police. All
recommendations to the Chief of Police by the Panel shall be made
available to the public to the extent permitted by law and this Agreement.
Section 4. Independent Investigation.
a) In this
Article, “Independent Investigation” means an administrative investigation
or inquiry of alleged or potential misconduct by an officer, authorized
by the Chief of Police or City Manager and conducted by a person(s)
who is not:
1. an employee
of the City of Austin;
2. an employee
of the Office of the Police Monitor; or
3. a volunteer
member of the Panel.
b) An “Independent
Investigation” does not include attorney-client work product or privileged
material related to the defense of claims or suits against the City
of Austin.
c) The Chief
of Police and the City Manager retain all management rights to authorize
an Independent Investigation concerning police conduct.
Section 5. Public Report of Independent Investigation.
a) The provisions
of Section 143.089(g) of the Texas Local Government Code are expressly
modified to the extent necessary to permit public release of a final
report prepared by an investigator who conducts an Independent Investigation
authorized by the Chief of Police or City Manager concerning police
conduct.
b) The public
release of information authorized by this Section shall not contain
or reveal evidentiary facts, or other substantive investigative information
from the file, except to the extent that such information is at the
time of such release no longer protected from public disclosure by
law, or is already public as a matter of fact by lawful or authorized
means or by the officer’s own release.
For example, the names of officers in an investigation may
not be released, but could be released if those officers have elected
to enter the public debate and discuss their involvement, or if the
public has been informed of identities by lawful or authorized means
in the course of grand jury or other legal proceedings. The public
statements authorized in this agreement are subject to review by the
City of Austin Law Department to insure compliance with this Agreement
and to determine whether the release of such information may be prohibited
by any other law.
c) This Section
shall apply to any Independent Investigation whether completed prior
to or after the effective date of this Agreement and applies to every
position and rank within the Austin Police Department.
d) Section
143.089(g) of the Texas Local Government Code is modified and superceded
to the extent necessary to permit the public release of the following
information only:
1. A report setting
forth the basis and concerns of the Panel supporting any recommendation
for an Independent Investigation.
2. A report setting
forth the Panel’s conclusions and recommendations after its review
of any Independent Investigation.
3. A report setting
forth any policy recommendations made by the Panel.
4. A final report
from an Independent Investigator, whether or not recommended by the
Panel. This Section shall also
apply to any Independent Investigation completed prior to ratification
of this agreement.
Section 6. Public Communication.
a) Except as
permitted by this Agreement, employees of the OPM and members of the
Panel shall not publicly comment on the specifics of pending complaints
and investigations prior to a panel decision.
All public comments and communications by the OPM shall be
factual and demonstrate impartiality to individual police officers,
the Austin Police Department, the Austin Police Association, employees
of the City of Austin, residents of the City of Austin, and community groups.
b) Should a
person participating on a Panel make public statements which, to a
reasonable observer, would be perceived to express or demonstrate
a position, bias, or prejudgment on the merits of a particular case
that is under investigation or subject to review, prior to the completion
of the citizen panel process for that case, such person will not be
allowed to participate in the review, deliberation, or drafting of
recommendations concerning that case. This provision does not prohibit the Panel or
an individual Panel member from making generic, non-case related public
statements about the Austin Police Department, or from providing information
about the process, which does not appear to prejudge the merits, or
demonstrate a bias on the case. In
the event of a violation of this standard, the Panel member shall
be subject to permanent removal from the panel as set forth below.
c) No public
comment or communication (including but not limited to oral or written
statements, reports, newsletters, or other materials made, released,
published or distributed) by the OPM or Panel members will make reference
to or identify an officer by name, unless such release is then permitted
by law, or the officer’s name has become public as a matter of fact
by lawful or authorized means, or by the officer’s own release.
Public comments or communications by the OPM and the Panel
shall conform with state and federal law and this Agreement regarding
confidentiality, and shall not contain information that is confidential
or privileged under this Agreement or state, federal or common law.
d)
All OPM written
publications shall be provided to the APD and the APA simultaneously
with distribution to the public.
Section 7. Dispute Resolution.
a) Complaints
concerning the conduct of OPM employees shall be filed with the Police
Monitor, or if the complaint concerns the personal conduct of the
Police Monitor, shall be filed with the City Manager.
If not resolved at the first level, a fact finder shall be
appointed to review relevant materials and take evidence to reach
written findings of fact, which shall be expedited for final resolution
within two weeks after appointment.
The fact finder shall be appointed by striking an AAA list,
if the parties do not otherwise agree on a fact finder.
Upon conclusion of the fact finding, and after review and evaluation
of the fact finder’s report, the Police Monitor (or City Manager if
the complaint concerns the personal conduct of the Police Monitor)
shall make a decision. The
final decision shall be made by the City Manager.
b) Complaints
concerning the conduct of Panel members shall be filed with the City
Manager. If a signed complaint
is filed alleging specific comments by a Panel member that violate
the standards in subparagraph 6 (b) above, the Panel’s consideration
shall be postponed or the particular Panel member shall not participate,
until the matter is finally resolved.
A complaint may not be based on statements or conduct previously
raised and found insufficient for disqualification.
Only one of such Panel members may be temporarily disqualified
under this provision on a particular case.
The City Manager shall promptly determine the complaint.
The Association may appeal from the decision of the City Manager
through the expedited arbitration process in this agreement.
If two (2) consecutive complaints are found insufficient on
a particular Panel member, subsequent complaints on that Panel member
shall not result in temporary removal, but upon final determination
that there has been a violation, such member shall be subject to permanent
removal. Nothing shall prevent
the Chief from taking disciplinary action within the statutory time
frame, under the provisions of Chapter 143, as modified by this agreement.
Section 8.
Access to Section 143.089(g) Files.
a) Information
concerning the administrative review of complaints against officers,
including but not limited to Internal Affairs Division files and all
contents thereof, are intended solely for the Department’s use pursuant
to Section 143.089(g) of the Texas Local Government Code (the 143.089(g)
file.). All records of the Police Monitor’s Office that
relate to individual case investigations and the APD 143.089(g) file,
although same are not APD files or records, shall have the same statutory
character in the hands of the Police Monitor, and shall not be disclosed
by any person, unless otherwise authorized by law.
Public access to such information is strictly governed by this
agreement and Texas law. To the
extent necessary to perform their duties, individuals involved in
the Citizen Oversight process are granted a right of access to the
information contained within the 143.089(g) files of police officers.
b) Individuals
involved in the Citizen Oversight process shall not be provided with
information contained within a personnel file, including the 143.089(g)
file of a police officer, that is made confidential by a law other
than Chapter 143 of the Texas Local Government Code, such as records
concerning juveniles, sexual assault victims, and individuals who
have tested positive for HIV. All persons who have access to IAD files or
investigative information by virtue of this agreement shall not be
provided with access to any records of criminal investigations by
the APD unless those materials are a part of the IAD administrative
investigation file.
c) All individuals
who have access by virtue of this agreement to IAD files or investigative
information, including the information contained within the 143.089(g)
files of police officers, shall be bound to the same extent as the
Austin Police Department and the City of Austin to comply with the
confidentiality provisions of this Agreement, Chapter 143 of the Texas
Local Government Code, and the Texas Public Information Act.
All such individuals shall further be bound to the same extent
as the Austin Police Department and the City of Austin to respect
the rights of individual police officers under the Texas Constitution
and the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution,
including not revealing information contained in a compelled statement
protected by the doctrine set forth in Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493 (1967), and Spevack
v. Klein, 385 U.S. 511 (1967).
d) A breach
of the confidentiality provisions of this Agreement and/or Chapter
143 of the Texas Local Government Code by any individual involved
in Citizen Oversight:
1. Shall be a
basis for removal from office;
2. May subject
the individual to criminal prosecution for offenses including, but
not limited to Abuse of Official Capacity, Official Oppression, Misuse
of Official Information, or the Texas Public Information Act; and/or
3. May subject
the individual to civil liability under applicable State and Federal
law.
e) The confidentiality
provisions of this agreement, Chapter 143 of the Texas Local Government
Code, and the Texas Public Information Act, are continuous in nature.
All individuals involved in Citizen Oversight are subject to
these confidentiality provisions even after their association with
the Oversight process has terminated.
Section 9. Use of Evidence from the Citizen Oversight
Process in Disciplinary Appeals.
Opinions or recommendations from individuals involved
in Citizen Oversight in a particular case may not be used by a party
in connection with an appeal of any disciplinary action under the
provisions of Chapter 143 of the Texas Local Government Code.
No party to an arbitration or Civil Service proceeding may
use or subpoena any individual involved in Citizen Oversight as a
witness at an arbitration or Civil Service proceeding including, but
not limited to live or deposition testimony which concerns the individuals
duties or responsibilities in the oversight process or their opinions
or recommendations in a particular case. This provision shall not
prevent any testimony for evidentiary predicate.
Section 10. Partial Invalidation and Severance.
In the event that a Court Order, Judgment, Texas Attorney
General Opinion, or arbitration decision, which is final and non-appealable,
or which is otherwise allowed to take effect, which order, judgment,
opinion, or decision holds that the right of access to the information
contained within the 143.089(g) files of police officers granted by
this Article or the public dissemination of information pursuant to
this Article, results in “public information” status under the Texas
Public Information Act of the information contained within the 143.089(g)
files of a police officer, the provision or provisions resulting in
such a change in the status of the 143.089(g) file shall be invalidated
and severed from the balance of this Agreement.
Section 11. Remedies.
A. Benefit
of the Bargain
The
CITY expressly retains its right and ability to proceed with the determination
of whether or not police misconduct occurred and the authority of
the Chief to impose disciplinary action.
The ASSOCIATION recognizes the fact that such reservations
are essential to this Agreement. No
dispute concerning the operation and function of the Police Monitor’s
Office or the Panel shall impair or delay the process of the Chief’s
investigation and determination of whether or not police misconduct
occurred and the degree of discipline, if any, to impose.
This includes internal dispute resolution procedures in this
Agreement, any grievance process or arbitration, and any litigation
over such issues. In other
words, any such dispute resolution processes may proceed, as set forth
in this contract or by law, but the disciplinary process may likewise
and simultaneously proceed to its conclusion without delay. The statutory
time period for the Chief of Police to take disciplinary action against
an officer shall be tolled to the extent of any period in which a
court order, injunction, or TRO, obtained by the officer involved
or the bargaining agent on behalf of the officer, halts the Department’s
investigative or disciplinary process. In no event will the actual
time exceed 180 days. The parties agree that the processes in this
Agreement, together with the remedies set forth and the procedural
protections and rights extended to officers in this Agreement are
adequate remedies at law for all disputes arising under this Article.
B. Expedited
Arbitration
The
parties have agreed to expedited arbitration for all unresolved grievances
related to the application or interpretation of this Article in order
to achieve immediate resolution and to avoid the need for court intervention
in equity. Such arbitrations
shall be conducted pursuant to the Expedited Labor Arbitration Procedures
established by the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”), as amended
and effective December 1, 2002. To be appointed,
the arbitrator must be available to hear the arbitration within thirty
(30) days of selection and a decision shall be made within one (1)
week of the hearing. The parties
agree to create a list of pre-approved arbitrators.
Failing same, or in the absence of an available arbitrator
from such pre-approved list, the arbitrator designated by the AAA
shall be required to be licensed as an attorney in the State of Texas. The parties
both agree that the arbitrator has the discretion to receive and hear
issues and testimony by written submission or phone conference, but
may also require live testimony where appropriate back
to top
ARTICLE 17
PROTECTED RIGHTS OF OFFICERS
Section 1. Effect
of Article.
The following provisions shall apply to the administrative
investigation of alleged misconduct by APD police officers and the
process of administrative discipline.
To the extent of any conflict between this Agreement and the
provisions of Chapter 143 of the Texas Local Government Code, the
provisions of this Agreement shall control.
To the extent of any conflict between this Article and any
other provision of this agreement, this Article shall control.
Section 2. Definitions.
In this Article:
a) “Complaint”
means any affidavit, administrative referral, or other document setting
forth allegations or facts that may form the basis of future allegations
of misconduct against an officer and which serves as the basis for
initiating an investigation.
b) “Disciplinary
Action” means suspension, indefinite suspension, demotion in rank,
reprimand, or any combination of those actions.
c) "Investigation" means an administrative investigation of
alleged misconduct by a police officer that could result in disciplinary
action.
d) "Investigator" means an agent or employee
of the Department or an Independent Investigator who participates
in conducting an investigation.
e) “Statement” means any communication (oral or written) setting forth
particulars or facts regarding the alleged misconduct under investigation.
f) “Evidence”
means statements, reports, records, recordings, documents, computer
data, text, graphics, videotape, photographs, or other tangible forms
of information, including a “complaint”.
Section 3. Compelled
Testimony.
There shall be no legal or administrative requirement,
including but not limited to subpoena power or an order from the City
Manager or the Department, that an officer appear before or present
evidence to any individual, panel, committee, group, or forum of any
type involved in Citizen Oversight.
This provision has no application to any Independent Investigation
authorized by the Chief of Police or the City Manager, regardless
of whether the Independent Investigation was recommended by the Citizen’s
Review Panel or the Police Monitor, or to any hearing of an appeal
of disciplinary action pursuant to this Agreement and/or Chapter 143
of the Texas Local Government Code. Police officers remain subject to orders or
subpoenas to appear and provide testimony or evidence in such investigations
or hearings.
Section 4. Access to
Records by Officers.
a) Not less
than forty eight (48) hours before the officer who is the subject
of an investigation provides a statement to an investigator, the officer
shall be provided a copy of the complaint(s).
The Department may omit the name and/or identity of the person
making the complaint. In the
event that the complaint(s) does not contain all allegations of misconduct
under investigation, not less than forty eight (48) hours before the
investigator begins the initial oral or written interrogation of the
officer, the investigator must inform the officer in writing of the
additional allegations being investigated.
b) Before the
officer who is the subject of an investigation provides a statement
to an investigator, the officer and his representative shall be provided
an opportunity to review any videotape, photograph, or other recording
of the operative conduct or alleged injuries, if any, which is the
subject of the allegations if such recording is within the possession
or control of the Department.
c) An officer
is entitled to a copy of his or her statement to the Internal Affairs
Division at the time when the statement is finalized and signed by
the officer, but the statement remains confidential in the hands of
the officer pursuant to 143.089(g), APD policy, and orders of non-communication
about internal investigations, except for consultations with counsel.
d) Before the
officer who is the subject of an investigation provides a statement
to an investigator, the officer and his representative shall be allowed
to review the portions of any document(s) in which it is alleged that
the officer provided false, incomplete, inconsistent, or conflicting
information, or in which it is alleged that the officer omitted information
in violation of any law or Department policy.
e) Before the
officer who is the subject of an investigation provides a statement
to an investigator, the officer and his representative shall be allowed
to review any report, supplement, use of force report, or other statement
recorded or written by the officer, setting forth particulars or facts
regarding the operative conduct which is the subject of the allegation(s).
f) Not less
than forty eight (48) hours before a DRB (or any other administrative
hearing conducted for the purpose of determining whether the Department
shall take disciplinary action against an officer for alleged misconduct,
the officer and his representative shall be allowed to review for
three (3) hours all evidence gathered or obtained during the investigation,
and not previously reviewed by the officer pursuant to this Section.
The evidence available for review shall not include any investigator’s
summary.
g) When the
Chief of Police is notified that the Panel plans to review a case
involving a “critical incident” or an allegation of a civil rights
violation, the officer and his representative shall be given an opportunity
to meet with the Internal Affairs investigator and review witness
statements and photographic or videotape evidence contained in the
IA file, for a period of up to three (3) hours.
h) Neither
the officer nor his representative will be permitted to make copies
of any witness statements, audio tapes, photographic or videotape
evidence reviewed; however, they may take written notes only, provided
that they comply with the confidentiality and use provisions in Section
6.
i)
Nothing in this
Article shall be construed as requiring the Department to provide
or make available for review by the officer or his representative
any evidence from criminal investigations by the Austin Police Department
unless that evidence is a part of the Internal Affairs Division administrative
file. No criminal investigation material that is part
of the Internal Affairs Department case file can be released if there
is a pending criminal investigation or judicial proceeding.
Section 5.
Audiotaping of Disciplinary Review Board Proceedings.
When
a DRB is held, the officer who is the subject of the investigation
may audio tape the portion of the DRB in which the chain-of-command
discusses the IAD investigation and the disciplinary decision with
the officer.
Section 6. Confidentiality
of Records and Misuse of Information.
The
access to records provided in Section 4 of this Article has been granted
in exchange for the following agreements intended to insure confidentiality
and to prevent retaliation or the threat of retaliation against any
witness in an investigation:
a) Retaliation
or the threat of retaliation by an officer, or by an individual at
the direction of the officer, against the author of an Internal Affairs
statement is strictly prohibited.
A sustained violation of this subsection shall result in either
a temporary or indefinite suspension.
b) If an officer
is suspended pursuant to this Section, the officer shall have the
right to appeal the suspension to the Civil Service Commission or
to an Independent Third Party Hearing Examiner pursuant to the provisions
of this Agreement and Chapter 143 of the Texas Local Government Code.
The Commission or the Hearing Examiner shall decide whether
the specific charge related to this Section is true.
If the charge is found to be true, the Commission or Hearing
Examiner must affirm the disciplinary action and cannot amend, modify,
or reduce the period of disciplinary suspension.
c) Sections
143.053(e) & (f) of the Texas Local Government Code are hereby
superceded to the extent of any conflict with this Section.
Section 7. Right to
Representation.
An
officer who is the subject of an investigation or administrative inquiry
shall have the right to be represented by an attorney of the officer’s
choice during an interview provided the attorney complies with the
Internal Affairs interview protocol.
An officer shall have the right to be represented by an attorney
of the officer’s choice during a DRB (or other administrative hearing
conducted for the purpose of determining whether the Department shall
take disciplinary action against an officer for alleged misconduct.)
Section 8. Violation
of Officer’s Rights.
If
the Department or any investigator violates any of the provisions
of this Article or of Section 143.312 of the Texas Local Government
Code while conducting an investigation, the Department shall reverse
any punitive action which depends upon evidence resulting from a violation
of this agreement; including a reprimand, and in any appeal, evidence
resulting from a violation of this agreement shall be specifically
excluded from introduction into evidence in any proceeding against
the officer, including any disciplinary appeal hearing.
The hearing examiner or arbitrator may make such other evidentiary
rulings as are just and fair, after consideration of the circumstances
of the violation. back to
top
ARTICLE 18
DISCIPLINARY ACTION AND APPEALS
Section 1. Suspensions of Three
(3) Days or Less.
Appealable and Non-Appealable Suspensions
It is understood that most officers
will make some errors during their career involving rule violations,
including those who are good, professional police officers. The parties
agree that short disciplinary suspensions are for the purpose of reinforcing
the need for compliance with departmental standards and not necessarily
as punishment.
The parties agree that when an officer
is suspended for 1, 2, or 3 days the officer may choose one of two
methods of dealing with the suspensions as listed below.
a)
Suspensions that may not be appealed.
The officer may choose to use vacation or holiday time to serve the
suspension with no loss of paid salary and no break in service for
purposes of seniority, retirement, promotion, or any other purpose.
The officer must agree that there is no right to appeal if
this method of suspension is chosen.
b)
Suspensions that may be appealed. The officer may appeal the suspension
to arbitration or the Civil Service Commission. If the officer chooses
to appeal the suspension, the arbitrator or Civil Service Commission’s
authority is limited to ruling on whether or not the charges against
the officer are true or not true. If the arbitrator or Civil Service
Commission finds the charges to be true, there is no authority to
mitigate the punishment. If the arbitrator or Civil Service Commission
finds the charges to be not true, the officer shall be fully reinstated
with no loss of pay or benefit.
Arbitration Costs on Appealable Suspensions
In the event that an officer appeals
a 1, 2 or 3 day suspension to arbitration, it is agreed that the party
that loses the arbitration shall be responsible for all costs of the
arbitrator, including travel and lodging if necessary.
To facilitate such payment on the part
of the officer he shall submit, at the time of appeal, a signed payroll
deduction agreement that if the arbitrator rules in favor of the City
he authorizes up to one hundred dollars ($100.00) per month to be
deducted from his regular pay until such time as what would usually
be the City’s portion of the arbitrator’s costs have been satisfied.
Reductions of Suspensions of Three (3) Days or Less to a Written
Reprimand
The parties agree that temporary suspensions
of 1, 2, or 3 days that were imposed on or after March
25, 2001,
will be automatically reduced to a written reprimand under the following
conditions:
a)
Suspensions
of 1, 2, or 3 days, which are/were not appealed, shall be reduced
to a written reprimand two (2) years after the date the suspension
was served on the officer if:
1.
The
officer does/did not have a sustained complaint for substantially
similar conduct within two (2) years from the date the suspension
was served on the officer.
b)
Suspensions
of 1, 2, or 3 days, which are/were not appealed, shall be reduced
to a written reprimand three (3) years after the date the suspension
was served on the officer if:
1.
The
officer has been previously disciplined for substantially similar
conduct, and;
2.
The
officer does/did not have a sustained complaint for substantially
similar conduct within the next three (3) years from the date the
suspension was served on the officer.
c)
Any
controversy over whether or not the prior conduct was substantially
similar may be presented to an arbitrator under the other provisions
of this Article.
d)
Suspensions
of 1, 2, or 3 days that are/were appealed to the Civil Service Commission
or a Hearing Examiner are not eligible for reduction to a written
reprimand under this Agreement.
e)
Suspensions
of 1, 2, or 3 days that are/were reduced to a written reprimand shall
not be introduced, cited, or used in any manner in subsequent disciplinary
suspensions or appeals as to that officer, but the original disciplinary
decision is not covered by this Section as to contentions of disparate
discipline by other officers.
f)
If
the conditions set forth in subparts (a) or (b) are met, the Department
shall notify the Civil Service Commission in writing that the temporary
suspension has been reduced to a written reprimand. A copy of this
document shall be included in the IAD investigative file, and the
Department shall enter a notation in all disciplinary databases or
records reflecting this change. The parties agree that the Department
and the Civil Service Commission will not alter, destroy, conceal,
or remove, any documents related to the temporary suspension, including
but not limited to the letter of temporary suspension that was filed
with the Commission as required by LGC 143.052(c), or the IAD investigative
file itself.
Section 2. Suspensions of Fifteen (15)
Days or Less.
If the Chief determines to suspend an officer for fifteen
(15) days or less, the Chief may, at his sole discretion in hardship
cases, authorize use of the officer's accumulated vacation leave to
cover all or part of the suspension.
It is also understood and agreed that if the Chief permits
the use of vacation days for suspension, such days off shall be considered
as equal punishment to traditional unpaid days of suspension.
In no case will sick leave be substituted for unpaid days of
suspension.
Section 3. Mutually Agreed Suspensions
of Sixteen (16) to Ninety (90) Days.
Either the Police Chief or the officer facing discipline
may offer to impose or accept a suspension without pay for a period
from sixteen (16) to ninety (90) days. If the officer accepts the
mutually agreed suspension, there shall be no appeal either to the
Police Civil Service Commission, to the District Court or to a Hearing
Examiner. It is also understood and agreed that if the
Chief permits the use of vacation days for suspension, such days off
shall be considered as equal punishment to traditional unpaid days
of suspension. In no case will sick leave be substituted for
unpaid days of suspension.
Section 4. Alternative Discipline
by the Police Chief.
In considering appropriate disciplinary action the Police
Chief may require that an officer be evaluated by a qualified professional
designated by the Police Chief. If
that professional recommends a program of counseling and/or rehabilitation
for the officer, the Police Chief may, as an alternative to temporary
or indefinite suspension, or in combination with a temporary suspension,
require that the officer successfully complete the recommended program.
The program of counseling and/or rehabilitation will be completed
on the officer's off-duty time, unless the Police Chief approves the
use of accrued vacation leave or sick leave. The officer shall be responsible for paying
all costs of the program of counseling and/or rehabilitation which
are not covered by the officer's health insurance plan.
If the officer's misconduct involves alcohol-related behavior,
the Police Chief may require that the officer submit to mandatory
alcohol testing, when ordered by the Police Chief, for a specified
period of time. If, after entering the program of counseling
and/or rehabilitation, the officer fails or refuses to complete the
program, the officer may be indefinitely suspended.
The officer has the right to appeal to the Police Civil Service
Commission or to a third party Hearing Examiner any discipline imposed
under this section by filing an appeal notice in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter 143. On
appeal, the Police Civil Service Commission or Hearing Examiner shall
have the same duties and powers set forth in Chapter 143, but shall
not have the power to substitute a program of counseling and/or rehabilitation
different from the program imposed by the Police Chief or to substitute
any period of suspension for the required program of counseling and/or
rehabilitation.
Section 5. Alternative Discipline by Agreement.
In considering appropriate disciplinary action, the
Police Chief may require that an officer be evaluated by a qualified
professional designated by the Police Chief.
If that professional recommends a program of counseling and/or
rehabilitation for the officer, the Police Chief may offer the officer
the opportunity to enter into an alternative disciplinary agreement
under which the officer would accept a temporary suspension of up
to ninety (90) days and agree to successfully complete the program
of counseling and/or rehabilitation recommended by the qualified professional
designated by the Police Chief. The program of counseling and/or rehabilitation
will be completed on the officer's off duty time, unless the Police
Chief approves the use of accrued vacation leave or sick leave. The officer shall be responsible for paying
all costs of the program of counseling and/or rehabilitation which
are not covered by the officer's health insurance plan.
If the officer's misconduct involved alcohol related behavior,
the Police Chief may require that the officer submit to mandatory
alcohol testing, when ordered by the Police Chief, for a specified
period of time. If the officer accepts the opportunity for agreed
alternative discipline, the officer may not appeal any terms of the
Agreement. If the officer fails
to successfully complete the program of counseling and/or rehabilitation,
the officer may be indefinitely suspended without right of appeal.
Section 6. Last Chance Agreement.
In considering appropriate disciplinary action, the
Police Chief may require that an officer be evaluated by a qualified
professional designated by the Police Chief.
If that professional recommends a program of counseling and/or
rehabilitation for the officer, the Police Chief may offer the officer,
as an alternative to indefinite suspension, the opportunity to enter
into a last chance agreement. The
agreement may include the following provisions in addition to any
other provisions agreed upon by the officer and the Police Chief.
a)
The officer
will successfully complete the program of counseling and/or rehabilitation
recommended by the qualified professional designated by the Police
Chief.
b)
The program
of counseling and/or rehabilitation will be completed on the officer's
off-duty time, unless the Police Chief approves the use of accrued
vacation leave or sick leave. The
officer shall be responsible for paying all costs of the program of
counseling and/or rehabilitation which are not covered by the officer's
health insurance plan.
c)
The officer
will agree to a probationary period not to exceed one (1) year, with
the additional requirement that if, during the probationary period,
the officer commits the same or a similar act of misconduct, the officer
will be indefinitely suspended without right of appeal.
If the officer's misconduct involves alcohol-related
behavior, the Police Chief may require that the officer submit to
mandatory alcohol testing, upon order by the Police Chief, for a specified
period of time. If the officer
accepts the opportunity for a last chance agreement, the officer
may not appeal any terms of the agreement.
If the officer fails to successfully complete the agreed upon
program, the officer may be indefinitely suspended without right of
appeal.
Section 7. Hearing
Examiner Retained.
The CITY recognizes that during the term of this Agreement
officers have the right to an appeal of an indefinite suspension or
suspension for a definite number of days (subject to the provisions
herein on non-appealable suspensions of 1 to 3 days) before a Hearing
Examiner as provided in Section 143.057 of the Texas Local Government
Code. During the term of this Agreement, the parties
specifically agree to retain this right of appeal, as modified herein,
notwithstanding any change to Section 143.057 which may occur as a
result of court or legislative action.
Section 8. Hearing Examiner Provisions.
In order to be mutually accepted on the hearing examiners
list, an individual must be impartial to the ASSOCIATION and the CITY,
shall be a member of the American Arbitration Association (AAA), have
formal training in presentation and evaluation of evidence, and have
experience in deciding municipal employment issues. The AAA shall administer the hearing
examiner panel.
Section 9. Procedures for Hearings Before Police Civil
Service Commission and Independent Hearing Examiners.
It is expressly agreed that Police Civil Service Commission
hearings and hearings before Hearing Examiners under 143.057 are informal
administrative hearings and are not subject to discovery or evidentiary
processes. Specifically it
is understood that neither the Texas Rules of Evidence (TRE) or the
Texas Rules of Court (TRC) apply to such hearings.
If the Department calls a witness to testify during a hearing
and that witness has given a statement to Internal Affairs regarding
the pending case, then the Department will provide a copy of that
statement to the officer's counsel at the time the witness is called
to testify.
Section 10. Procedures Before Hearing
Examiners.
In any proceeding before a hearing examiner, the following
procedures shall be followed:
a)
The Department
shall furnish the charge letter to the hearing examiner by delivering
a copy to the AAA far enough in advance, so that the hearing examiner
receives the copy at least five (5) days before the start of the hearing.
b)
The officer
may furnish a position statement to the hearing examiner by delivering
copies to the AAA and to the Department far enough in advance, so
that the hearing examiner and the Department receives the copies at
least five (5) days before the start of the hearing.
c)
At the close
of the presentation of evidence, the hearing examiner shall conduct
a post‑hearing conference with counsel for the Department and
the officer and advise counsel what issue(s) the hearing officer wants
covered in post‑hearing briefs.
This does not preclude either party from briefing anything
not requested by the hearing examiner.
d)
Failure of the
AAA to meet its obligations as set out in this Subsection does not
jeopardize the hearing rights of either the City or the officer.
Section 11.
Mediation.
The City shall implement a voluntary mediation process
concerning citizen complaints. The
Association may appoint two persons to work with the City in developing
the specific operating procedure.
The process shall include and be based upon the following concepts:
a)
Mediation shall
be an option offered to the complainant at the time the initial complaint is filed for minor nature complaints, such as
rudeness.
b)
For a complaint
to proceed to mediation, both the officer and the complaining citizen
must voluntarily agree.
c)
Once mediation
has been agreed to, the matter cannot be returned to the Department
to be handled as a disciplinary matter.
Section 12.
Preemption.
It is expressly understood and agreed that this Article
shall be entitled to preemption, including but not limited to the
provisions of Subchapter D of the Texas Local Government Code Chapter
143.
back to top
ARTICLE 19
ASSIGNMENT
CHANGES
Section 1. Advance Notice of Assignment
Changes.
Except for normal shift rotations, for assignment changes
that are determined far enough in advance, the Department will provide
a twenty-eight (28) calendar-day notice to the affected officer. Advance notice of the assignment change may
be waived by the Chief or his designee, if prior notice is not in
the best interest of the Department or in any emergency situations. Advance notice of the assignment change may
be waived by the officer. In
the event of special hardship, an affected officer may appeal to the
Assistant Chief of their Bureau for consideration of temporary scheduling
or other adjustments to reduce or address personal hardships. The Chief shall create a joint committee
with representatives appointed by the ASSOCIATION to evaluate hardship
claims and to recommend action to the Assistant Chief.
Section 2.
Requested Job Assignment Transfers.
A reasonable, good faith effort shall be made to post
initial assignment vacancies. It
is recognized and understood that notice cannot be sent for all backfill
transfers resulting from the initial vacancies.
The usual process shall be to post notice and reference to
the APD bulletin board and City email.
This notice may be sent out to all employees on alpha pager,
as near as possible to ten (10) days before closing the application
process whether or not you get it.
It shall be satisfactory to send an “all page” notice whether
or not each individual officer receives it. Oral or written reprimands shall not affect
an employee’s ability to apply for a transfer to a sought after position,
but may be considered along with all other factors in making a selection
among applicants. Applying
for a posted position shall neither jeopardize nor insure an officer’s
current assignment. The Chief
shall establish a committee with representatives appointed by the
ASSOCIATION to recommend changes or improvements in the process of
posting notice of job assignment opportunities or openings.
back to top
ARTICLE 20
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
PROCESS
Section 1.
Goals and Objectives.
The parties agree that they share the interest of resolving
disputes with minimum confrontation.
To this end, the parties will attempt to insure that disputes
are identified and resolved through a process committed to mutual
respect, open communication, and joint problem solving.
Section 2.
Nature of Grievances.
A grievance may be filed under this procedure by the
ASSOCIATION or by any individual officer to whom this AGREEMENT applies. A grievance based on an allegation of the violation
of any provision of federal or state law, which law provides an outside
administrative process for initial review by an agency prior to litigation,
is voluntary only and need not be exhausted prior to pursuit of any
available legal remedy. A grievance based on any other allegation
of the violation of any provision of federal or state law must be
filed and pursued to completion in order to exhaust the administrative
remedies available under this Agreement and in order to allow the
City an opportunity to investigate, address, and resolve any such
dispute. A grievance which
does not relate to the application and/or interpretation of any provision
of this Agreement shall proceed through the process only through Step
3 and the decision of the Police Chief at that step shall be final. A grievance which relates to the application
and/or interpretation of any provision of this Agreement shall proceed
through this process until it is resolved or until the process is
completed. Grievances pending as of the effective date
of this Agreement shall be processed under procedures in effect prior
to the Agreement. Pending shall
mean that the written grievance has been filed.
Section 3.
Days and Timelines.
For purposes of this Article, all timelines are based
on calendar days excluding weekends and City observed holidays. In addition, the day of the act, event or default
after which a period of time begins to run is not included. The last day of the period is included unless,
it is a weekend or City observed holiday.
Any timeline or deadline provided in this Article
may be extended by mutual written agreement of the parties involved
at the particular step of the process where the timeline applies. If any timeline or deadline for a decision is
missed by the City, the grievance automatically proceeds to the next
step in the process. Except
for Step 2, if any timeline or deadline for action is missed by the
ASSOCIATION or the Grievant, the grievance is considered to be resolved
and dismissed.
Section 4.
Association Grievance Committee.
The ASSOCIATION President shall appoint the chairperson
and members of the Austin Police Association Grievance Committee.
Members of the committee shall serve until a replacement is
appointed by the ASSOCIATION President.
Section 5.
Association Representatives.
The Grievant may be accompanied by and/or represented
by one representative at all steps of the process. If the ASSOCIATION pursues the grievance following
Step 2, the ASSOCIATION shall be considered to be the Grievant at
all subsequent steps in the process.
Section 6.
Pre‑Grievance Stage.
The parties acknowledge that it is usually most desirable
for officers and supervisors to resolve problems through free and
informal communications. To
accomplish this goal, officers shall try, within fifteen (15) days
after an officer's actual or constructive knowledge of the event giving
rise to an issue, to resolve the issue with his/her immediate supervisor
and the supervisor one level above the immediate supervisor.
Section 7.
Filing the Grievance.
If the issue is not resolved at the Pre‑Grievance
Stage, and if the officer wishes to carry the grievance forward, the
officer shall, within five (5) days after the final grievance meeting
with his supervisors, file a written statement of the issue giving
rise to the grievance. In any
event, the written grievance statement must be filed within thirty
(30) days of the grievant’s actual or constructive knowledge of the
event giving rise to the grievance.
The Office of Personnel Services shall indicate the date of
filing upon the written grievance statement.
The written grievance statement shall be completed on a form
adopted by the Police Chief. The officer shall be responsible for notifying
the Association of the grievance by sending a copy of the written
grievance statement to the Association President or his designee.
Section 8.
Steps of Grievance Process.
The steps of the grievance process are as follows:
Step 1
Within
five (5) days after the written grievance statement is filed, the
officer's division Sergeant and Lieutenant will schedule a meeting
to occur no more than ten (10) days after the filing of the grievance.
A grievance filed by a Sergeant or Lieutenant shall result in a meeting
with the Division Commander. The meeting
will bring together the Grievant and all relevant parties in an effort
to try to resolve the grievance informally.
Any decision by the Sergeant, Lieutenant, or Commander at Step
1 is subject to final review and approval by the Chief.
Such approval shall be noted on the grievance form before it
is returned to the Office of Personnel Services and the Association
President, or his designee. If
this meeting does not resolve the grievance, the Lieutenant will schedule
a meeting within ten days with the Commander.
If the meeting resolves the grievance, the decision will be
noted on the grievance form within ten (10) days after the meeting
occurs and copies of the grievance form shall be returned to the officer,
by personal delivery, or by mail to the officer’s home address as
shown in Department records. The completed form shall be filed with
Department's Office of Personnel Services, and a copy sent to the
Association President or his designee
Step 2
A
grievance that does not relate to the application and/or interpretation
of any provision of this Agreement shall proceed to Step 3 and by‑pass
this step. If a contract grievance
is not resolved at Step 1, the Grievant shall, within ten (10) days
after the completion of Step 1, take the grievance to the Association
Grievance Committee for consideration.
If the Association determines that it wishes to pursue the
grievance further, written notice of that decision which includes
a statement of the occurrence upon which the grievance is based, the
provisions of the Agreement that have been violated, and a proposed
resolution of the grievance must be provided to the Police Chief within
ten (10) days after the Association Grievance Committee receives the
grievance.
Step 3
Within
five (5) days after receiving written notice from the Association
as a result of Step 2, or within five (5) days after receiving written
notice from the grievant as a result of Step 1, the Police Chief will
schedule a meeting to occur no more than fifteen (15) days after receipt
of the written notice. The officer shall be given forty-eight (48)
hours notice of the meeting. If the meeting is for a contract grievance, the
meeting will include Association representatives. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the
issue giving rise to the grievance and seek to resolve the grievance. The Police Chief's written decision on the resolution
of the grievance shall be made within five (5) days after the Step
3 meeting occurs. The response
shall be personally delivered to the officer or mailed by certified
mail, return receipt requested, to the officer’s home address as shown
in Department records. A copy shall be sent to the Office of Personnel
Services, and if originally notified of the grievance, the Association
President or his/her designee.
Step 4
If
a grievance involving the application or interpretation of this Agreement
is not resolved at Step 3 by the Police Chief's decision, the parties
may within five (5) days after the date of the Chief's written decision,
schedule a meeting to occur no more than ten (10) days after the date
of the Chief's written decision. This step is optional and will be
used only if the parties mutually agree to use Interest Based Bargaining
(IBB) principles or mediation by a third party mediator to resolve
the dispute. The purpose of the meeting will be to resolve
the grievance. The meeting
shall include three (3) representatives selected by the Association
and three (3) representatives selected by the Police Chief.
If there is an individual grievant, he/she shall be one of
the Association representatives.
All of the representatives, except for individual grievant,
must have been trained in Interest Based Bargaining or dispute resolution
and at least two (2) representatives from each side shall have participated
in the negotiation of this Agreement.
For purposes of this step, the parties intend to use the Interest
Based Bargaining concepts and principles utilized in negotiating this
Agreement. If the grievance
is resolved at Step 4, the parties will prepare a memorandum setting
forth their understanding of the resolution of the grievance.
If Step 4 is not utilized, or if settlement is not reached,
then the Association may proceed with the grievance to Step 5.
Step 5
If
a grievance involving the application or interpretation of this Agreement
is not resolved at Step 3 or 4, the Association may within ten (10)
days after conclusion of Step 4 request that the grievance be submitted
to arbitration in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. The arbitration hearing will be scheduled by
agreement at the earliest date possible, preferably within thirty
(30) days after conclusion of Step 3 and 4.
The arbitrator will be selected
as agreed or under the AAA process.
The
hearing shall be held at a location which is convenient for all parties
and the arbitrator and shall be conducted informally, without strict
evidentiary or procedural rules.
Unless otherwise mutually agreed, the submission to the arbitrator
shall be based on the written grievance statement submitted by the
Association at Step 2. The arbitrator shall consider and decide only
the issue(s) in the grievance statement or submitted in writing by
agreement of the parties. The hearing shall be concluded as expeditiously
as possible and the arbitrator's written decision shall be provided
to both parties within thirty (30) days after close of the hearing.
The
parties specifically agree that the arbitrator's authority shall be
strictly limited to interpreting and applying the explicit provisions
of this Agreement. The arbitrator
shall not have authority to modify the agreement or create additional
provisions not included in the Agreement.
The parties agree that neither the City nor the Association
shall have ex parte communications with the arbitrator concerning any matter
involved in the grievance submitted to the arbitrator. Each party shall be responsible for its own
expenses in preparing for and representing itself at arbitration,
but the fees of the arbitrator shall be borne equally by the parties. The written decision of the arbitrator shall
be final and binding on both parties, shall not create a basis for
retroactive adjustment in any other case, and shall not be appealable.
Section 9. Precedential Value of Decisions.
For purposes of interpreting or applying the provisions
of this Agreement, only those decisions made at or after Step 3 of
this process shall have any precedential value in any later grievance
or dispute between the parties.
Section 10. Agreement for Logistics of Arbitration.
The parties may enter into a Memorandum of Understanding
which provides for administrative support services in connection with
the maintenance of the arbitrator panel, scheduling of hearings,
billing of fees, etc., by the American Arbitration Association.
back to top
ARTICLE 21
TERM OF AGREEMENT AND PUBLIC SAFETY PREMIUM WAGE ADJUSTMENT
This
agreement shall continue in effect under the following terms and conditions:
- For Fiscal Year 2003-2004
base wages paid to police officers shall remain at rates in effect
on April 1, 2003.
- For Fiscal Year 2004-2005
(October 1, 2004), and each year thereafter, beginning with the
first day of each fiscal year, base wages paid to police officers
shall be increased by two percent (2%) above the base percentage
amount established and set aside for “meet expectations” compensation
adjustments for non-civil service City of Austin employees for that
fiscal year. In the event that no compensation adjustment
is established and set aside for non-civil service City of Austin
employees for that Fiscal Year, base wages for police officers shall
be increased by two percent (2%).
- In the event that non-civil
service City of Austin employees have three consecutive years without
base wage increases, police officers shall not receive an increase
in the third of those three consecutive years.
The “base percentage amount” established and set aside
for “meets expectations” compensation adjustments for non-civil service
City of Austin employees, as referred to above, is determined annually
by the City Council in the adopted City budget and associated documents.
The City Manager shall provide a statement of this amount to the President
of the Association within thirty (30) calendar days of the adoption
of the City budget by the City Council, which shall be determinative
in the absence of fraud or a clear abuse of discretion. .
- Either party may propose
a single contract article, or new issue for re-negotiations after
October 1, 2006 of this agreement, and each year thereafter; provided,
however, that the party making such proposal forfeits the option
to make any proposal for a change during the following full contract
year. The parties may mutually agree to corrections or clarifications
by Memorandum of Agreement, with the authority of the Board of Directors
of the Association and the City Manager for the City.
- Either party may terminate
this agreement after the first five years of its term with written
notification to the other party at least ninety (90) calendar days
prior to September 30, 2008. In
the event that neither party terminates the agreement at the end
of the fifth year, the contract shall continue in effect until either
party terminates this agreement by providing written notification
to the other party at least ninety (90) calendar days prior to the
end of each calendar year thereafter.
- This agreement is intended
to form the basis for a longstanding legal framework for the labor
relationship among the parties, and to substantially eliminate the
need for periodic comprehensive contract negotiations. However, the parties recognize that unforeseen
developments in the law of legal issues upon which they have relied
may change the viability of this agreement for either side. Rather than including in this agreement
many of the details or the process which were in the former agreement,
the parties have limited the provisions in this agreement to those
that are necessary. This
includes agreements on the issues which may require a contractual
modification of existing civil service law (access to the 143.089(g)
file, and release of defined reports from Independent Investigations),
agreements to outline the broad concepts of citizen oversight, and
agreements which clarify rights which exist with or without the
agreement. Other aspects
of the City’s implementation of citizen oversight are its prerogatives
under Texas law and the City Charter, and do not require contractual
provisions. Both parties
recognize that the City may proceed with citizen oversight under
this new agreement substantially as it has done under the prior
agreement, and the City is entitled to the maintenance of those
prior rights and prerogatives, although this agreement does not
require the City to operate citizen oversight under the prior provisions,
except to the extent now specified in this agreement.
Both parties recognize that without the continued ability
of the City to carry out citizen oversight, this agreement would
not have been reached, either as to the economic issues or the additional
provisions for the procedural protections of officer’s rights.
In the event of any court order, judgment, Texas Attorney
General’s opinion or arbitration decision brought or caused by officers
or the APA which substantially impairs oversight access to the 143.089(g)
file, prevents release of the defined portions of reports of independent
investigation, invalidates the 180 tolling provision in Article
16, or impairs the City’s right to expedited arbitration as contemplated
herein, the City may reopen negotiations to resolve and correct
the issue or an alternate resolution, notwithstanding the limitations
on raising new issues in this Article. If a negotiated resolution of the issue
is not achieved, the City may terminate this agreement after 90
days written notice, and the parties may resume negotiations toward
a successor agreement under the provisions Section 143.301 et.seq.,
of the Texas Local Government Code.
In like manner, in the event of any court order, judgment,
Texas Attorney General’s opinion or arbitration decision brought
or caused by the City of Austin or other party with standing under
this agreement substantially impairs the provisions of Article 17
pertaining to officer’s rights, or which would allow full access
to investigative evidence of officer misconduct in the absence of
a disciplinary decision imposed by the Chief, the APA may reopen
negotiations to resolve and correct the issue or an alternate resolution,
notwithstanding the limitations on raising new issues in this Article.
If a negotiated resolution is not achieved, the APA may terminate
this agreement upon 90 days written notice, and the parties may
resume negotiations toward a successor agreement under the provisions
Section 143.301 et.seq., of the Texas Local Government Code.
- The Association may
terminate this agreement with ninety (90) calendar days written
notification during any year in which the City establishes “market
study based compensation” increases and does not establish base
percentage increases for non-civil service City of Austin employees.
- In the event of any
temporary expiration of the prior agreement before the legally effective
approval of this agreement, this agreement shall nevertheless control
all matters and rights defined hereunder, in spite of any such interim
lapse or gap, as if this agreement had become immediately effective
upon the expiration of the prior agreement.
This provision of the agreement shall not require exhaustion
of administrative remedies by any person claiming rights relating
to it or asserting its invalidity. back to top
ARTICLE 22
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
Section 1. Effect of Termination of Agreement.
In the event that a successor Agreement has not been
ratified by October 1, 2008, and this agreement has not automatically
renewed for an additional year, then when this Agreement terminates,
all the provisions of this Agreement, both economic and non‑economic,
shall expire and no longer be in full force and effect, except for:
a)
All promotional
eligibility lists created during this agreement which shall be valid
for eighteen months, even after this Agreement terminates.
b) Any hiring process which
has been commenced in substantial reliance upon the provisions in
this agreement.
c) Any disciplinary case which has been scheduled
for a DRB meeting and the officer has been so notified prior to the
date of the termination of this agreement shall proceed to conclusion
under the provisions of this agreement.
d) The Promotions Article, the provision for three
(3) day limited appeal suspensions, the Union Dues check off article,
and the Association Business Leave Article contained in this agreement
shall remain in full force and effect until a successor agreement
has been reached, or twelve (12) months after expiration/termination,
which ever is earlier.
e) After, expiration/termination of this agreement, it is expressly
understood that the wages and compensation specified in this Agreement
may then be placed at a level determined by the City Manager, as funds
are authorized by the City Council, and this does not preclude wages
and compensation being rolled back to pre‑contract levels, as
they existed on the day prior to the effective date of this Agreement.
Section 2. Funding Obligations.
The CITY presently intends to continue this Agreement
each fiscal year through its term, to pay all payments due, and to
fully and promptly perform all of the obligations of the CITY under
this Agreement. All obligations of the CITY shall be paid only
out of current revenues or any other funds lawfully available therefore
and appropriated for such purpose by the City Council, in compliance
with the Texas Constitution, Article XI, Sections 5 and 7. In the
event that the City of Austin
cannot meet its funding obligations, as provided in the State Constitution,
this entire Agreement becomes null and void. back
to top
ARTICLE 23
ENTIRE AGREEMENT
Section 1. Obligation During Term of Agreement.
The parties acknowledge that during the negotiations
which resulted in this Agreement, each had the unlimited right and
opportunity to raise issues and make proposals with respect to any
subject or matter not removed by law from the meet and confer process,
and that the understandings and agreements arrived at by the parties
after the exercise of that right and opportunity are set forth in
this Agreement. Therefore,
the CITY and the ASSOCIATION, for the duration of this Agreement,
each voluntarily and unqualifiedly waive the right, and each agrees
that the other shall not be obligated, to meet and confer with respect
to any subject or matter referred to, or covered in this Agreement,
or with respect to any subject or matter not specifically referred
to or covered in this Agreement, even though such subjects or matters
may not have been within the knowledge or contemplation of either
or both of the parties at the time they negotiated or signed this
Agreement, except as provided for single issue negotiation above.
This Agreement may be amended during its term by the parties,
by written mutual agreement ratified in accordance with the provisions
of Chapter 143.
In the event that the Texas Legislature amends any provision
of Texas Local Government Code Chapters 141, 142 and 143 that changes wages or benefits for City of
Austin Police Officers during the term of this Agreement, any such
amendment shall not be applicable to the officers covered by this
Agreement, unless the City Council adopts such amendment by Ordinance. Examples of A wages and benefits include, but
are not limited to, base salary, longevity, assignment pay, sick leave,
vacation, health insurance, and weapon provision mandates. back
to top
ARTICLE 24
SAVINGS CLAUSES
Section 1. Effect of Illegal Provision.
If any provision of this Agreement is subsequently declared
by legislative or judicial authority to be unlawful, unenforceable,
or not in accordance with applicable statutes, all other provisions
of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for the duration
of this Agreement, and the parties shall meet as soon as possible
to agree on a substitute provision. However,
if the parties are unable to agree within thirty (30) days following
commencement of the initial meeting, then the matter shall be postponed
until meet and confer negotiations are resumed.
Section 2. Preemption of Local Government Code and Other
Provisions.
The provisions of this Agreement shall supersede the
provisions of any statute, Executive Order, local ordinance, or rule,
which are in conflict herewith, including for example and not by
way of limitation, the contrary provisions of Chapter 143; Ordinances
of the City of Austin, Texas; and Rules and Regulations of the Police
Officers' Civil Service Commission for the City of Austin, Texas.
This preemption provision is authorized by Section
143.307 of the Texas Local Government Code, and the parties have expressly
agreed that each and every provision involving or creating such a
conflict shall have the effect of superceding the statutory standard
or result which would otherwise obtain, in the absence of this agreement. This provision is of the essence to the bargain
and agreement which has been reached.
Section 3. Change in Authorized Representative.
During the term of this Agreement, if there is a withdrawal
of recognition of the APA pursuant to Section 143.304 of the Texas
Local Government Code, then it will be the CITY's option to continue
the terms of this Agreement or to cancel the contract and engage in
negotiations with the successor organization, if any.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HAVE CAUSED TO HAVE
THIS AGREEMENT TO BE SIGNED BY THEIR DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES
ON THIS DAY OF __________2004.
______________________
_____________________________
Toby
Hammett Futrell,
Mike Sheffield, President,
City
Manager
Austin Police Association
back to top